These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

462 related items for PubMed ID: 9351765

  • 1. The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.
    Williams MC, Krammer J, O'Brien WF.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Nov; 90(5):784-9. PubMed ID: 9351765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M, Roos C, Arabin B, Stoutenbeek P, Visser GH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Prediction of cervical response to prostaglandin E2 using fetal fibronectin.
    Tam WH, Tai SM, Rogers MS.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Nov; 78(10):861-5. PubMed ID: 10577614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Cervical maturation by repeated applications of prostaglandin E2 gel. 186 cases].
    Panel P, Bascou V, de Meeus JB, Magnin G.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1997 Nov; 26(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 9265064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Ramsey PS, Ogburn PL, Harris DY, Heise RH, Ramin KD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1616-9. PubMed ID: 10871486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix.
    Xenakis EM, Piper JM, Conway DL, Langer O.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 9241300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Double-blind comparison of 2.5 and 5.0 mg of prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Smith CV, Miller A, Livezey GT.
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):745-8. PubMed ID: 8913976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of two methods.
    Krammer J, Williams MC, Sawai SK, O'Brien WF.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Apr; 85(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 7898843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.