These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

471 related items for PubMed ID: 9351765

  • 21. Use of misoprostol for cervical ripening.
    Katz VL, Farmer RM, Dean CA, Carpenter ME.
    South Med J; 2000 Sep; 93(9):881-4. PubMed ID: 11005347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The use of low dose 1.5 mg prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening and induction of labor at term with unfavorable cervix.
    Herabutya Y, O-Prasertsawat P.
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Nov; 78(11):590-5. PubMed ID: 8576669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. A randomized trial of extra-amniotic saline infusion plus intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel for ripening the cervix and inducing labor in patients with unfavorable cervices.
    Rouben D, Arias F.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Aug; 82(2):290-4. PubMed ID: 8336880
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol.
    Crane JM, Delaney T, Butt KD, Bennett KA, Hutchens D, Young DC.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):319-23. PubMed ID: 15280123
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Prostaglandin E2 gel for cervical ripening in patients with an indication for delivery.
    Darroca RJ, Buttino L, Miller J, Khamis HJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Feb; 87(2):228-30. PubMed ID: 8559529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kehila M, Bougmiza I, Ben Hmid R, Abdelfatteh W, Mahjoub S, Channoufi MB.
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
    Fonseca L, Wood HC, Lucas MJ, Ramin SM, Phatak D, Gilstrap LC, Yeomans ER.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
    Adeniji OA, Oladokun A, Olayemi O, Adeniji OI, Odukogbe AA, Ogunbode O, Aimakhu CO, Omigbodun AO, Ilesanmi AO.
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Pre-induction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 gel: intracervical versus intravaginal route.
    Zanini A, Ghidini A, Norchi S, Beretta E, Cortinovis I, Bottino S.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Oct; 76(4):681-3. PubMed ID: 2216204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
    Dalui R, Suri V, Ray P, Gupta I.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [Prediction of successful induction of labor: a comparison between fetal fibronectin assay and the Bishop score].
    Droulez A, Girard R, Dumas AM, Mathian B, Berland M.
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 Nov; 37(7):691-6. PubMed ID: 18602765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M, Pflum J, Howard D.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 vaginal suppositories.
    Buchanan D, Macer J, Yonekura ML.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):659-63. PubMed ID: 6585733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 at preterm.
    Melamed N, Yogev Y, Hadar E, Hod M, Ben-Haroush A.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008 May; 87(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 18158629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
    Greybush M, Singleton C, Atlas RO, Balducci J, Rust OA.
    J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Comparing two dinoprostone agents for preinduction cervical ripening at term. A randomized trial.
    Wieland D, Friedman F.
    J Reprod Med; 1999 Aug; 44(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 10483544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W, Trimech A, Haddad A, Hajjaji A, Saidani Z, Faleh R, Sakouhi M.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Evaluation of glyceryl trinitrate, misoprostol, and prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening in term pregnancy.
    Sharma Y, Kumar S, Mittal S, Misra R, Dadhwal V.
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Jun; 31(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 15916656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Current practice and results of labor induction].
    Csorba R, Aranyosi J, Juhász G, Zatik J, Major T.
    Orv Hetil; 2003 Oct 05; 144(40):1977-80. PubMed ID: 14626639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
    How HY, Leaseburge L, Khoury JC, Siddiqi TA, Spinnato JA, Sibai BM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct 05; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.