These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
42. Cervical ripening with intravaginal prostaglandin E2 gel. Prins RP, Bolton RN, Mark C, Neilson DR, Watson P. Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 6572335 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter: the role of pre- and postripening ultrasound examination of the cervix. Cromi A, Ghezzi F, Tomera S, Scandroglio S, Colombo G, Bolis P. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jan; 196(1):41.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17240227 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Lin MG, Reid KJ, Treaster MR, Nuthalapaty FS, Ramsey PS, Lu GC. Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Predictors of efficacy for cervical ripening among the Bishop score criteria in nulliparous women at term. Ducarme G, Berthommier L, Planche L. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Jun; 161(3):934-941. PubMed ID: 36426906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Cervical ripening at term with repeated administration of dinoprostone vaginal pessary]. Petrovic Barbitch M, Gnisci A, Marcelli M, Capelle M, Guidicelli B, Cravello L, Gamerre M, Agostini A. Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013 Jun; 41(6):346-50. PubMed ID: 23562543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score. Rozenberg P, Chevret S, Chastang C, Ville Y. BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Role of prostaglandin-induced cervical changes in labor induction. Jagani N, Schulman H, Fleischer A, Mitchell J, Blattner P. Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 6582419 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Induction of labor and cervical ripening by intracervical prostaglandin E2. Sørensen SS, Brocks V, Lenstrup C. Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Jan; 65(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 3880877 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score. Gonen R, Degani S, Ron A. Eur J Ultrasound; 1998 Aug; 7(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 9700213 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Pre-cervical ripening and hygroscopic cervical dilators in pre-labor induction. D'Indinosante M, Vidiri A, Giorgi L, Turrini I, Spanò A, Perelli F, Scatena E, Mattei A, Lanzone A, Scambia G, Cavaliere A. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2023 Dec; 36(2):2239422. PubMed ID: 37574214 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Cervical ripening. A retrospective experience with prostaglandin E2 "chips". Smith CV, Eglinton GS. J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):388-90. PubMed ID: 2352231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of Cervidil versus Prepidil. Chyu JK, Strassner HT. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):606-11. PubMed ID: 9322631 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]