These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

127 related items for PubMed ID: 9364949

  • 21. Comparison of prognostic value of different MRI classifications of signal intensity change in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.
    Avadhani A, Rajasekaran S, Shetty AP.
    Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):475-85. PubMed ID: 20494809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Iopamidol as an oral contrast media for computed tomography: a taste comparison to iohexol, diatrizoate sodium, and barium sulfate.
    Rogers D, Sheth C, Eisenmenger L, Mignogna E, Winter T.
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2822-2826. PubMed ID: 28669111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Oral magnetic particles as a contrast agent for MR imaging of the abdomen. A phase III clinical trial.
    Vlahos L, Gouliamos A, Kalovidouris A, Athanasopoulou A, Kotoulas G, Lygidakis N, Liaou A, Matsaidonis D, Papavasiliou C.
    Hepatogastroenterology; 1994 Feb; 41(1):82-5. PubMed ID: 8175124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. OMR, a positive bowel contrast agent for abdominal and pelvic MR imaging: safety and imaging characteristics.
    Patten RM, Moss AA, Fenton TA, Elliott S.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992 Feb; 2(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 1623278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Hyperparathyroidism--comparison of flash imaging with spin echo MR imaging.
    Noguchi Y, Takashima S, Ikezoe J, Yoshii M, Koide T, Kozuka T.
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Nov; 34(6):625-30. PubMed ID: 8240901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Optimization of a contrast medium suitable for conventional enteroclysis, MR enteroclysis, and virtual MR enteroscopy.
    Papanikolaou N, Prassopoulos P, Grammatikakis J, Maris T, Kouroumalis E, Gourtsoyiannis N.
    Abdom Imaging; 2002 Nov; 27(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 12172989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Signal intensity ratio on magnetic resonance imaging as a prognostic factor in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy.
    Kim TH, Ha Y, Shin JJ, Cho YE, Lee JH, Cho WH.
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Sep; 95(39):e4649. PubMed ID: 27684796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Barium sulfate for abdominal computer assisted tomography.
    Hatfield KD, Segal SD, Tait K.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1980 Aug; 4(4):570. PubMed ID: 7391310
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Magnesium sulfate as an oral contrast medium in magnetic resonance imaging of the small intestine.
    Shi H, Liu C, Ding HY, Li CW.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e370-5. PubMed ID: 22197089
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. MR enterography with oral contrast agent composed of methylcellulose, low-dose barium sulfate, sorbitol, and lactulose: assessment of diagnostic performance, reliability, image quality, and patient tolerance.
    Evrimler S, Algin O.
    Clin Imaging; 2016 Mar; 40(3):523-30. PubMed ID: 27133698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
    Koo CW, Shah-Patel LR, Baer JW, Frager DH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.