These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

298 related items for PubMed ID: 9367237

  • 1. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II. Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli.
    Tykocinski M, Shepherd RK, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):147-57. PubMed ID: 9367237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates.
    Tykocinski M, Shepherd RK, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1995 Aug; 88(1-2):124-42. PubMed ID: 8575988
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following acute electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: III. Capacitive versus non-capacitive coupling of the stimulating electrodes.
    Huang CQ, Shepherd RK, Seligman PM, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 116(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 9508028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve at high stimulus rates: a physiological and histopathological study.
    Xu J, Shepherd RK, Millard RE, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1997 Mar; 105(1-2):1-29. PubMed ID: 9083801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. IV. Effects of stimulus intensity.
    Huang CQ, Shepherd RK.
    Hear Res; 1999 Jun; 132(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 10392548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates: V. Effects of electrode surface area.
    Huang CQ, Shepherd RK.
    Hear Res; 2000 Aug; 146(1-2):57-71. PubMed ID: 10913884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Acute study on the neuronal excitability of the cochlear nuclei of the guinea pig following electrical stimulation.
    Liu X, McPhee G, Seldon HL, Clark GM.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1997 May; 117(3):363-75. PubMed ID: 9199522
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [The effect of high-rate electrical stimulation on excitability of auditory nerve in Guinea pigs].
    Liu A, Wang Z, Cui Y, Zhou L, Chi F.
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2005 May; 19(10):454-6, 460. PubMed ID: 16108323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Effect of stimulus waveshape on single fibre response properties.
    Shepherd RK, Javel E.
    Hear Res; 1999 Apr; 130(1-2):171-88. PubMed ID: 10320107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effect of high-frequency electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in an animal model of cochlear implants.
    Vischer M, Haenggeli A, Zhang J, Pelizzone M, Häusler R, Rouiller EM.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S27-9. PubMed ID: 9391586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of increasing duration of stimulation on the electrically evoked auditory brainstem and middle latency responses in pediatric cochlear implant users.
    Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA.
    J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Aug; 37(4):559-64. PubMed ID: 19128593
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD, Abbas PJ, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Aug; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of interphase gap and pulse duration on electrically evoked potentials is correlated with auditory nerve survival.
    Prado-Guitierrez P, Fewster LM, Heasman JM, McKay CM, Shepherd RK.
    Hear Res; 2006 May; 215(1-2):47-55. PubMed ID: 16644157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures.
    Miller CA, Woodruff KE, Pfingst BE.
    Hear Res; 1995 Dec; 92(1-2):85-99. PubMed ID: 8647749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
    Haenggeli A, Zhang JS, Vischer MW, Pelizzone M, Rouiller EM.
    Audiology; 1998 Dec; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cochlear pathology following chronic electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: II. Deafened kittens.
    Shepherd RK, Matsushima J, Martin RL, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1994 Dec; 81(1-2):150-66. PubMed ID: 7737922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status.
    Shepherd RK, Javel E.
    Hear Res; 1997 Jun; 108(1-2):112-44. PubMed ID: 9213127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.
    Riggs WJ, Vaughan C, Skidmore J, Conroy S, Pellittieri A, Carter BL, Stegman CJ, He S.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Jun; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses in pediatric cochlear implant users. Part I: duration effects.
    Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA.
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):7-14. PubMed ID: 18692121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.