These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

349 related items for PubMed ID: 9372468

  • 1. Proximo-cervical adaptation of Class II-composite restorations after thermocycling: a quantitative and qualitative study.
    Schuckar M, Geurtsen W.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Oct; 24(10):766-75. PubMed ID: 9372468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Lösche GM, Roulet J.
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations.
    Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Lösche GM, Wernecke KD, Roulet JF.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Aug; 25(5):401-10. PubMed ID: 11203848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of thickness of flowable resins on marginal leakage in class II composite restorations.
    Malmström HS, Schlueter M, Roach T, Moss ME.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Aug; 27(4):373-80. PubMed ID: 12120775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S, Inokoshi S, Ozer F, Pereira PN, Ogata M, Tagami J.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Aug; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M, Hannig M.
    J Adhes Dent; 2000 Aug; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of insertion technique and adhesive system on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM, Johnson WW.
    J Adhes Dent; 2005 Aug; 7(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 16430011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T, Lösche AC, Lösche GM, Roulet JF.
    J Dent; 1999 Feb; 27(2):119-28. PubMed ID: 10071469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effectiveness of an infiltrant on sealing of composite restoration margins with/without artificial caries.
    Tulunoglu O, Tulunoglu IF, Antonson SA, Campillo-Funollet M, Antonson D, Munoz-Viveros C.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov 01; 15(6):717-25. PubMed ID: 25825096
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Spahr A, Schön F, Haller B.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct 01; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Marginal permeability of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems.
    Owens BM, Johnson WW, Harris EF.
    Oper Dent; 2006 Oct 01; 31(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16536195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Marginal and internal adaptation of class II restorations after immediate or delayed composite placement.
    Dietschi D, Monasevic M, Krejci I, Davidson C.
    J Dent; 2002 Oct 01; 30(5-6):259-69. PubMed ID: 12450717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Oct 01; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sealing ability of packable resin composites in class II restorations.
    Fabianelli A, Goracci C, Ferrari M.
    J Adhes Dent; 2003 Oct 01; 5(3):217-23. PubMed ID: 14621243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluation of microleakage in cervical margins of various posterior restorative systems.
    Bedran de Castro AK, Pimenta LA, Amaral CM, Ambrosano GM.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2002 Oct 01; 14(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 12008798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Influence of different restorative techniques on marginal seal of class II composite restorations.
    Rodrigues Junior SA, Pin LF, Machado G, Della Bona A, Demarco FF.
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2010 Oct 01; 18(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 20379680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM, Charpentier JF, Albert AI, Geerts SO.
    Oper Dent; 2006 Oct 01; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo.
    Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ, Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH.
    J Dent; 1998 Sep 01; 26(7):555-62. PubMed ID: 9754743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM, Johnson WW.
    Oper Dent; 2006 Sep 01; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.