These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

114 related items for PubMed ID: 9391587

  • 1. Temporal representations with cochlear implants.
    Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Zerbi M.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S30-4. PubMed ID: 9391587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effects of stimulus manipulation on electrophysiological responses of pediatric cochlear implant users. Part II: rate effects.
    Davids T, Valero J, Papsin BC, Harrison RV, Gordon KA.
    Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 244(1-2):15-24. PubMed ID: 18692122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Acute effects of electrical intracochlear multichannel high-rate stimulation of the auditory nerve of cats.
    Cords SM, Reuter G, Lenarz T.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S19-20. PubMed ID: 9391581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reduction in excitability of the auditory nerve following electrical stimulation at high stimulus rates. II. Comparison of fixed amplitude with amplitude modulated stimuli.
    Tykocinski M, Shepherd RK, Clark GM.
    Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 112(1-2):147-57. PubMed ID: 9367237
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Basic neurophysiology of cochlear-implants.
    Klinke R, Hartmann R.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S7-10. PubMed ID: 9391576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of temporal properties on compound action potentials in response to amplitude-modulated electric pulse trains in guinea pigs.
    Jeng FC, Abbas PJ, Hu N, Miller CA, Nourski KV, Robinson BK.
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 19015019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM, Chen XQ, Zhao XT, Kong Y, Li YX, Liu S, Liu B, Mo LY.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Loudness growth in cochlear implants: effect of stimulation rate and electrode configuration.
    Fu QJ.
    Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 202(1-2):55-62. PubMed ID: 15811699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG, Skinner MW, Gotter BD, Strube MJ, Brenner CA.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Characterizing responses from auditory cortex in young people with several years of cochlear implant experience.
    Gordon KA, Tanaka S, Wong DD, Papsin BC.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Oct; 119(10):2347-62. PubMed ID: 18752993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Adaptation of the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) recorded from nucleus CI24 cochlear implant users.
    Clay KM, Brown CJ.
    Ear Hear; 2007 Dec; 28(6):850-61. PubMed ID: 17982371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of inter-phase gap on the sensitivity of cochlear implant users to electrical stimulation.
    Carlyon RP, van Wieringen A, Deeks JM, Long CJ, Lyzenga J, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):210-24. PubMed ID: 15953530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effects of pulse rate on thresholds and loudness of biphasic and alternating monophasic pulse trains in electrical hearing.
    van Wieringen A, Carlyon RP, Macherey O, Wouters J.
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):49-60. PubMed ID: 16904278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.
    Riggs WJ, Vaughan C, Skidmore J, Conroy S, Pellittieri A, Carter BL, Stegman CJ, He S.
    Ear Hear; 2021 Oct; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 3. ECAP during bursts and loudness as function of burst duration.
    Cohen LT.
    Hear Res; 2009 Jan; 247(2):112-21. PubMed ID: 19068227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: effects of high-rate pulse trains.
    Runge-Samuelson CL, Abbas PJ, Rubinstein JT, Miller CA, Robinson BK.
    Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 194(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 15276671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Electrically evoked auditory potentials: current clinical applications in children with cochlear implants.
    Kileny PR, Zwolan TA, Boerst A, Telian SA.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S90-2. PubMed ID: 9391613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Refractory recovery function of electrical auditory on the survival auditory nerve in cochlear implant recipients].
    Xi X, Ji F, Han DY, Huang DL, Hong MD, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb; 39(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 15195587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.