These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Are older patients with prolapse likely to continue pessary use? A retrospective observational study. Dykes N, Lim YN, Zilberlicht A, Dwyer PL. Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Dec; 34(12):2919-2923. PubMed ID: 37572122 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of pessary use on genital hiatus measurements in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Jones K, Yang L, Lowder JL, Meyn L, Ellison R, Zyczynski HM, Moalli P, Lee T. Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 112(3):630-6. PubMed ID: 18757662 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ring and Gellhorn pessaries used in patients with pelvic organ prolapse: a retrospective study of 8 years. Yang J, Han J, Zhu F, Wang Y. Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Sep; 298(3):623-629. PubMed ID: 29978415 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Factors associated with pessary fitting in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: A large prospective cohort study. Ma C, Xu T, Kang J, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Liang S, Zhu L. Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Nov; 39(8):2238-2245. PubMed ID: 32936968 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical use of ring with support pessary for advanced pelvic organ prolapse and predictors of its short-term successful use. Deng M, Ding J, Ai F, Zhu L. Menopause; 2017 Aug; 24(8):954-958. PubMed ID: 28419067 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]