These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
182 related items for PubMed ID: 9401340
21. The family, the courts, and mental health professionals. Hennessey EF. Am Psychol; 1989 Sep; 44(9):1223-4. PubMed ID: 2782729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluating the best interests of the child--a model of multidisciplinary teamwork. Pardess E, Finzi R, Sever J. Med Law; 1993 Sep; 12(3-5):205-11. PubMed ID: 8231685 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Child custody and child psychiatry. Herman SP. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1988 Mar; 27(2):260. PubMed ID: 3360737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. [Co-production of knowledge about custody criteria with subjects affected by their parents' custody dispute: a participatory study]. Kaltenborn KF. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2004 Mar; 53(3):167-81. PubMed ID: 15112844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The inclusion of disability as a condition for termination of parental rights. Lightfoot E, Hill K, LaLiberte T. Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Dec; 34(12):927-34. PubMed ID: 21030082 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Biological parents regaining their rights: a psycholegal analysis of a new era in custody disputes. Kermani EJ, Weiss BA. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995 Mar; 23(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 8605410 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Child psychiatric documentation in child visitation and custody disputes--results of a survey]. Andritzky W. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2003 Dec; 52(10):794-811. PubMed ID: 14699788 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Helping parents with serious mental illness retain custody of their children. FSS/PACE Program, Community Mental Health Center for Mid-Eastern Iowa. Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Nov; 54(11):1526-8. PubMed ID: 14600313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [The handling of custodial criteria by expert evaluators and the expectations for solution-oriented evaluations from the perspective of Austrian family court judges]. Bein N, Völkl-Kernstock S, Klicpera C, Friedrich MH. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr; 2008 Nov; 57(2):117-29. PubMed ID: 18396849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The forensic evaluation and court testimony. Haller LH. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am; 2002 Oct; 11(4):689-704. PubMed ID: 12397893 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]