These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Computerized electrocardiogram interpretations: are they useful for the family physician? Grauer K, Kravitz L, Curry RW, Ariet M. J Fam Pract; 1987 Jan; 24(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 3540179 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. ST-segment distortion in manual report mode of electrocardiographs. Health Devices; 1995 Jan; 24(8-9):362-3. PubMed ID: 8530307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Strict reliance on a computer algorithm or measurable ST segment criteria may lead to errors in thrombolytic therapy eligibility. Massel D, Dawdy JA, Melendez LJ. Am Heart J; 2000 Aug; 140(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 10925334 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Data analysis of diagnostic accuracies in 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation by junior medical fellows. Novotny T, Bond RR, Andrsova I, Koc L, Sisakova M, Finlay DD, Guldenring D, Spinar J, Malik M. J Electrocardiol; 2015 Aug; 48(6):988-94. PubMed ID: 26381796 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of electrode positioning on ECG interpretation by computer. Schijvenaars BJ, Kors JA, van Herpen G, Kornreich F, van Bemmel JH. J Electrocardiol; 1997 Jul; 30(3):247-56. PubMed ID: 9261733 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis. Anh D, Krishnan S, Bogun F. J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]