These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


157 related items for PubMed ID: 9405529

  • 1. Conditioning-related protection from acoustic injury: effects of chronic deefferentation and sham surgery.
    Kujawa SG, Liberman MC.
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Dec; 78(6):3095-106. PubMed ID: 9405529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Efferent-mediated protection from acoustic overexposure: relation to slow effects of olivocochlear stimulation.
    Reiter ER, Liberman MC.
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Feb; 73(2):506-14. PubMed ID: 7760114
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Long-term sound conditioning enhances cochlear sensitivity.
    Kujawa SG, Liberman MC.
    J Neurophysiol; 1999 Aug; 82(2):863-73. PubMed ID: 10444683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Selective removal of lateral olivocochlear efferents increases vulnerability to acute acoustic injury.
    Darrow KN, Maison SF, Liberman MC.
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 97(2):1775-85. PubMed ID: 17093118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The olivocochlear efferent bundle and susceptibility of the inner ear to acoustic injury.
    Liberman MC.
    J Neurophysiol; 1991 Jan; 65(1):123-32. PubMed ID: 1999726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Involvement of cochlear efferent pathways in protective effects elicited with binaural loud sound exposure in cats.
    Rajan R.
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Aug; 74(2):582-97. PubMed ID: 7472366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Frequency and loss dependence of the protective effects of the olivocochlear pathways in cats.
    Rajan R.
    J Neurophysiol; 1995 Aug; 74(2):598-615. PubMed ID: 7472367
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Protective effect of the cochlear efferent system during noise exposure.
    Attanasio G, Barbara M, Buongiorno G, Cordier A, Mafera B, Piccoli F, Nostro G, Filipo R.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1999 Nov 28; 884():361-7. PubMed ID: 10842606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Reducing noise damage by using a mid-frequency sound conditioning stimulus.
    Canlon B, Fransson A.
    Neuroreport; 1998 Jan 26; 9(2):269-74. PubMed ID: 9507967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.