These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

371 related items for PubMed ID: 9407659

  • 21. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
    Müller-Deile J, Rudert H, Brademann G, Frese K.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Cochlear implantation in late-implanted prelingually deafened adults: changes in quality of life.
    Straatman LV, Huinck WJ, Langereis MC, Snik AF, Mulder JJ.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):253-9. PubMed ID: 24448285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Performance of prelingually or postlingually deafened adults who were using a single or multichannel cochlear implant.
    Hinderink JB, Snik AF, Mens LH, Brokx JP, van den Broek P.
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Mar; 73(3):180-3. PubMed ID: 8205980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Electrode ranking of "place pitch" and speech recognition in electrical hearing.
    Nelson DA, Van Tasell DJ, Schroder AC, Soli S, Levine S.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1987-99. PubMed ID: 7593921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. The effects of limiting the number of Nucleus 22 cochlear implant electrodes programmed on speech perception.
    Geier LL, Norton SJ.
    Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):340-8. PubMed ID: 1487094
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effects of electrode configuration and place of stimulation on speech perception with cochlear prostheses.
    Pfingst BE, Franck KH, Xu L, Bauer EM, Zwolan TA.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Jun; 2(2):87-103. PubMed ID: 11550528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant.
    Fryauf-Bertschy H, Tyler RS, Kelsay DM, Gantz BJ.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1992 Aug; 35(4):913-20. PubMed ID: 1405546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Changes in speech intelligibility of postlingually deaf adults after cochlear implantation.
    Gould J, Lane H, Vick J, Perkell JS, Matthies ML, Zandipour M.
    Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):453-60. PubMed ID: 11770668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects.
    Collins LM, Zwolan TA, Wakefield GH.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jan; 101(1):440-55. PubMed ID: 9000735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.