These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

242 related items for PubMed ID: 9409037

  • 1. Review of the first 50 cases completed by the RACR mammography QA programme: phantom image quality, processor control and dose considerations.
    McLean D, Eckert M, Heard R, Chan W.
    Australas Radiol; 1997 Nov; 41(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 9409037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A survey on performance status of mammography machines: image quality and dosimetry studies using a standard mammography imaging phantom.
    Sharma R, Sharma SD, Mayya YS.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 22090414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Implementation of the European protocol for quality control of the technical aspects of mammography screening in Bulgaria.
    Vassileva J, Avramova-Cholakova S, Dimov A, Lichev A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jul; 114(1-3):403-5. PubMed ID: 15933146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Quality control in mammography.
    Hendrick RE, Botsco M, Plott CM.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1041-57. PubMed ID: 7480654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Quality assurance in screening mammography.
    Health Devices; 1990 Nov; 19(5-6):152-98. PubMed ID: 2372321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Survey of mammography practice in Croatia: equipment performance, image quality and dose.
    Faj D, Posedel D, Stimac D, Ivezic Z, Kasabasic M, Ivkovic A, Kubelka D, Ilakovac V, Brnic Z, Bjelac OC.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Nov; 131(4):535-40. PubMed ID: 18940818
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Mammography accreditation.
    Hare WS.
    Australas Radiol; 1997 Nov; 41(4):323. PubMed ID: 9409021
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Dose sensitivity of three phantoms used for quality assurance in digital mammography.
    Figl M, Semturs F, Kaar M, Hoffmann R, Kaldarar H, Homolka P, Mostbeck G, Scholz B, Hummel J.
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jan 21; 58(2):N13-23. PubMed ID: 23257608
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. How good is the ACR accreditation phantom for assessing image quality in digital mammography?
    Huda W, Sajewicz AM, Ogden KM, Scalzetti EM, Dance DR.
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Jul 21; 9(7):764-72. PubMed ID: 12139090
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. ACR accreditation of nuclear medicine and PET imaging departments.
    MacFarlane CR, American College of Radiologists.
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2006 Mar 21; 34(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 16517965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.