These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

211 related items for PubMed ID: 9410006

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Sensitivity S of film-screen systems and mode of operation of different automatic exposure systems in general practice conditions. II: Automatic exposure systems].
    Blendl C, Kondmann M, Müller J.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Nov; 7(6):333-8. PubMed ID: 9467029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Dose to population as a metric in the design of optimised exposure control in digital mammography.
    Klausz R, Shramchenko N.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Nov; 114(1-3):369-74. PubMed ID: 15933139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Light production from intensifying screens (theoretical and experimental aspects)].
    Giacomich R, Tomasini F, Bacarini L, Di Lelio A.
    Radiol Med; 1982 Nov; 68(7-8):571-80. PubMed ID: 7134508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Comparison of film-screen combinations in contrast-detail diagram and with interactive image analysis. 3: Trimodal histograms of gray scale distribution in bar groups of lead pattern images].
    Hagemann G, Eichbaum G, Stamm G.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1998 May; 8(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9645256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Absolute speeds of screen-film systems and their absorbed-energy constants.
    Kodera Y, Doi K, Chan HP.
    Radiology; 1984 Apr; 151(1):229-36. PubMed ID: 6701320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Quality assurance through constancy control for x-ray film processors (author's transl)].
    Weberling R.
    Rontgenblatter; 1982 Jun; 35(6):248-54. PubMed ID: 7089438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Comparison of screens and screen-film-systems (author's transl)].
    Maurer HJ, Goos F.
    Radiologe; 1979 Jun; 19(6):239-42. PubMed ID: 461776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Sharpness of detail and density in film-screen systems].
    Maurer HJ, Goos F.
    Rontgenblatter; 1986 Sep; 39(9):260-3. PubMed ID: 3775203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [The effect of scattered radiation and tube focal size on the background density of x-ray pictures using an x-ray exposure system].
    Klein J, Zimny N.
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990 Sep; 31(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 2343100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR, Davies AG, Kengyelics SM.
    Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [The effect of technical parameters on diagnostic quality].
    Brandt GA.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 2018801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.