These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

179 related items for PubMed ID: 9421559

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Breast cancer screening for women aged 40 to 49 years--what does the evidence mean for New Zealand?
    Baker S, Wall M, Bloomfield A.
    N Z Med J; 2005 Aug 26; 118(1221):U1628. PubMed ID: 16138166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
    Bick U.
    Rofo; 2006 Oct 26; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Cost-effectiveness analysis of breast cancer screening with mammography].
    Iinuma T.
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Jun 28; 65 Suppl 6():226-8. PubMed ID: 17682158
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Breast cancer screening, outside the population-screening program, of women from breast cancer families without proven BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations: a simulation study.
    Jacobi CE, Nagelkerke NJ, van Houwelingen JH, de Bock GH.
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2006 Mar 28; 15(3):429-36. PubMed ID: 16537697
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium].
    Grivegnée AR, Autier P.
    Rev Med Brux; 2001 Sep 28; 22(4):A277-81. PubMed ID: 11680188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Breast cancer screening lacking effectiveness].
    Giard RW, Bonneux LG.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Nov 17; 145(46):2205-8. PubMed ID: 11757241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The cost-effectiveness of mammography screening: evidence from a microsimulation model for New Zealand.
    Szeto KL, Devlin NJ.
    Health Policy; 1996 Nov 17; 38(2):101-15. PubMed ID: 10160378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Early detection of breast cancer in women.
    Humphrey LL, Ballard DJ.
    Prim Care; 1989 Mar 17; 16(1):115-32. PubMed ID: 2495540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The role of "free" mammograms in motivating first-time screening: a community experiment.
    Scammon DL, Smith JA, Beard T.
    J Ambul Care Mark; 1995 Mar 17; 6(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 10170371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care.
    Tice JA, Kerlikowske K.
    Prim Care; 2009 Sep 17; 36(3):533-58. PubMed ID: 19616154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A statistical evaluation of mammography: crucial questions for health systems.
    Watson CJ, Chesteen SA.
    J Soc Health Syst; 1993 Sep 17; 4(1):68-79. PubMed ID: 8268470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Breast cancer screening in relation to access to health services.
    Facione NC.
    Oncol Nurs Forum; 1999 May 17; 26(4):689-96. PubMed ID: 10337647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium].
    Autier P, Grivegnée AR.
    Rev Med Brux; 1995 May 17; 16(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 7481252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Finance issue brief: women's health: breast & cervical cancer screening coverage requirements: year end report-2002.
    Plaza CI.
    Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2002 Dec 31; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 12901355
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.