These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

112 related items for PubMed ID: 9430435

  • 1. Comparisons of sperm quality, morphometry and function among human sperm populations recovered via SpermPrep II filtration, swim-up and Percoll density gradient methods.
    Yamamoto Y, Maenosono S, Okada H, Miyagawa I, Sofikitis N.
    Andrologia; 1997; 29(6):303-10. PubMed ID: 9430435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Preparation of human frozen-thawed seminal specimens using the SpermPrep filtration method: improvements over the conventional swim-up method.
    Zavos PM.
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Jun; 57(6):1326-30. PubMed ID: 1601158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Preparation of oligozoospermic and/or asthenozoospermic semen for intrauterine insemination using the SpermPrep semen filtration column.
    Ohashi K, Saji F, Wakimoto A, Kato M, Tsutsui T, Tanizawa O.
    Fertil Steril; 1992 Apr; 57(4):866-70. PubMed ID: 1313377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of Percoll discontinuous density gradients vs SpermPrep II vs Sephadex G-50 gel filtration on semen parameters.
    Check JH, Zavos PM, Katsoff D, Kiefer D.
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 1993 Mar; 169(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 7504330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Sperm selection by PD-10 sephadex columns: comparison with SpermPrep filtration and Percoll centrifugation.
    López O, Mata A, Antich M, Bassas L.
    Hum Reprod; 1993 May; 8(5):732-6. PubMed ID: 8314969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison between the quality and function of sperm after semen processing with two different methods.
    Hammadeh ME, Zavos PM, Rosenbaum P, Schmidt W.
    Asian J Androl; 2001 Jun; 3(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 11404797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Use of postseparation sperm parameters to determine the method of choice for sperm preparation for assisted reproductive technology.
    Smith S, Hosid S, Scott L.
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Mar; 63(3):591-7. PubMed ID: 7851592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Epididymal spermatozoa: recovery and subsequent improvements of mouse epididymal spermatozoa via the SpermPrep filtration method.
    Zavos PM, Correa JR, Zarmakoupis PN.
    Tohoku J Exp Med; 1995 Feb; 175(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 7541168
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Preparation and recovery of frozen-thawed bovine spermatozoa via various sperm selection techniques employed in assisted reproductive technologies.
    Correa JR, Zavos PM.
    Theriogenology; 1996 Nov 01; 46(7):1225-32. PubMed ID: 16727985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of sperm preparation methods. Wash and concentration, swim-up, migration-gravity sedimentation, 80% Percoll and semen filtration column.
    Matsuoka I, Fujino Y, Ito F, Koh B, Kojima T, Ogita S.
    J Reprod Med; 1995 May 01; 40(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 7608872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Human spermatozoa selected by Percoll gradient or swim-up are equally capable of binding to the human zona pellucida and undergoing the acrosome reaction.
    Morales P, Vantman D, Barros C, Vigil P.
    Hum Reprod; 1991 Mar 01; 6(3):401-4. PubMed ID: 1659585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Selection of single-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid spermatozoa via the SpermPrep filtration column.
    Sofikitis N, Miyagawa I, Zavos PM.
    Fertil Steril; 1993 Mar 01; 59(3):690-2. PubMed ID: 8458481
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of Percoll discontinuous density gradients vs SpermPrep II vs Sephadex G-50 gel infiltration on semen parameters.
    Check JH, Zavos PM, Katsoff D, Kiefer D.
    Arch Androl; 1993 Mar 01; 31(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 7690541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Flow cytometric comparison between swim-up and Percoll gradient techniques for the separation of frozen-thawed human spermatozoa.
    Chen Y, Obhrai MS, Chapman J, Cuthbert JL, Williams A, Tang L.
    Int J Fertil; 1992 Mar 01; 37(5):315-9. PubMed ID: 1358845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Isolation of motile spermatozoa: comparison of Percoll centrifugation, SpermPrep filtration, and swim-up techniques.
    Ziebe S, Andersen CY.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1993 Oct 01; 10(7):485-7. PubMed ID: 8069093
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Glass wool column filtration versus mini-Percoll gradient for processing poor quality semen samples.
    Johnson DE, Confino E, Jeyendran RS.
    Fertil Steril; 1996 Sep 01; 66(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 8751748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Spermatozoa selected by a discontinuous Percoll density gradient exhibit better motion characteristics, more hyperactivation, and longer survival than direct swim-up.
    Moohan JM, Lindsay KS.
    Fertil Steril; 1995 Jul 01; 64(1):160-5. PubMed ID: 7789552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Profiles of sperm morphology and motility after discontinuous multiple-step Percoll density gradient centrifugation.
    Yao YQ, Ng V, Yeung WS, Ho PC.
    Andrologia; 1996 Jul 01; 28(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 8849048
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison between a two-layer discontinuous Percoll gradient and swim-up for sperm preparation on normal and abnormal semen samples.
    Chen SU, Ho HN, Chen HF, Chao KH, Lin HR, Huang SC, Lee TY, Yang YS.
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 1995 Nov 01; 12(10):698-703. PubMed ID: 8624426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.