These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

140 related items for PubMed ID: 9430545

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Contrasting blue-on-yellow with white-on-white visual fields: Roles of visual adaptation for healthy peri- or postmenopausal women younger than 70 years of age.
    Eisner A, Toomey MD, Incognito LJ, O'malley JP, Samples JR.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5605-14. PubMed ID: 17122155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm.
    Wild JM, Pacey IE, Hancock SA, Cunliffe IA.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1152-61. PubMed ID: 10235548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The statistical interpretation of blue-on-yellow visual field loss.
    Wild JM, Moss ID, Whitaker D, O'Neill EC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jun; 36(7):1398-410. PubMed ID: 7775118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evidence for a learning effect in short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Wild JM, Kim LS, Pacey IE, Cunliffe IA.
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 16458091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma?
    Ferreras A, Polo V, Larrosa JM, Pablo LE, Pajarin AB, Pueyo V, Honrubia FM.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Feb; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in subjects with suspected glaucoma (I): assessment of sensitivity thresholds].
    Polo Llorens V, Pinilla Lozano I, Pablo Júlvez LE, Larrosa Poves JM, Abecia Martínez E, Cuevas Andrés R, Rojo Aragües A, Honrubia López FM.
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Feb; 75(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 11151126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY, Dodge RM, Remington LA.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Short-wavelength perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucoma: comparison with standard automated perimetry].
    Qi S, Jiang Y.
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11955298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The different effects of aging on normal sensitivity in flicker and light-sense perimetry.
    Lachenmayr BJ, Kojetinsky S, Ostermaier N, Angstwurm K, Vivell PM, Schaumberger M.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1994 May; 35(6):2741-8. PubMed ID: 8188467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Test-retest variability for standard automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in diabetic patients.
    Bengtsson B, Hellgren KJ, Agardh E.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 17935606
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.