These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Family, clinician, and patient perceptions of coercion in mental hospital admission. A comparative study. Hoge SK, Lidz CW, Eisenberg M, Monahan J, Bennett N, Gardner W, Mulvey EP, Roth L. Int J Law Psychiatry; 1998; 21(2):131-46. PubMed ID: 9612714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Involuntary commitment as a psychiatric technology. Hiday VA. Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1996; 12(4):585-603. PubMed ID: 9136469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Coercion and legal protection in psychiatric care in Finland. Kokkonen P. Med Law; 1993; 12(1-2):113-24. PubMed ID: 8377603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The Danish Mental Health Act of 1989: psychiatric discretion and the new legalism. Vestergaard J. Int J Law Psychiatry; 1994; 17(2):191-210. PubMed ID: 7914184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Detention--law or colours of law?]. Krzymiński S. Psychiatr Pol; 2010; 44(2):287-8. PubMed ID: 20677447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Italy's revolutionary mental health law: an assessment. Mosher LR. Am J Psychiatry; 1982 Feb; 139(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 7055290 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Coercion in psychiatric care: what have we learned from research? Lidz CW. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998 Feb; 26(4):631-7. PubMed ID: 9894219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient perception of coercion on admission to acute psychiatric services. The New Zealand experience. McKenna BG, Simpson AI, Laidlaw TM. Int J Law Psychiatry; 1999 Feb; 22(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 10224553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]