These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 9438507

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Direct digital radiography versus storage phosphor radiography in the detection of wrist fractures.
    Peer S, Neitzel U, Giacomuzzi SM, Pechlaner S, Künzel KH, Peer R, Gassner E, Steingruber I, Gaber O, Jaschke W.
    Clin Radiol; 2002 Apr; 57(4):258-62. PubMed ID: 12014869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Contrast-detail phantom study for x-ray spectrum optimization regarding chest radiography using a cesium iodide-amorphous silicon flat-panel detector.
    Hamer OW, Völk M, Zorger N, Borisch I, Büttner R, Feuerbach S, Strotzer M.
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):610-8. PubMed ID: 15377940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography at different exposure doses versus mammography film: possibility of radiation dose reduction in detecting rheumatologic bone defects.
    Zähringer M, Reineck S, Perniok A, Krüger K, Andermahr J, Rubbert A, Winnekendonk G.
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Mar; 49(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 18300139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects.
    Prokop M, Galanski M, Oestmann JW, von Falkenhausen U, Rosenthal H, Reimer P, Nischelsky J, Reichelt S.
    Radiology; 1990 Oct; 177(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 2399307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Image quality vs. radiation dose for a flat-panel amorphous silicon detector: a phantom study.
    Geijer H, Beckman KW, Andersson T, Persliden J.
    Eur Radiol; 2001 Oct; 11(9):1704-9. PubMed ID: 11511892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Dose reduction in skeletal and chest radiography using a large-area flat-panel detector based on amorphous silicon and thallium-doped cesium iodide: technical background, basic image quality parameters, and review of the literature.
    Völk M, Hamer OW, Feuerbach S, Strotzer M.
    Eur Radiol; 2004 May; 14(5):827-34. PubMed ID: 14968260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies.
    Fischbach F, Ricke J, Freund T, Werk M, Spors B, Baumann C, Pech MJ, Felix R.
    Invest Radiol; 2002 Nov; 37(11):609-14. PubMed ID: 12393973
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Chest radiography with a flat-panel detector: image quality with dose reduction after copper filtration.
    Hamer OW, Sirlin CB, Strotzer M, Borisch I, Zorger N, Feuerbach S, Völk M.
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):691-700. PubMed ID: 16192324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
    Cowen AR, Kengyelics SM, Davies AG.
    Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film).
    Rong XJ, Shaw CC, Johnston DA, Lemacks MR, Liu X, Whitman GJ, Dryden MJ, Stephens TW, Thompson SK, Krugh KT, Lai CJ.
    Med Phys; 2002 Sep; 29(9):2052-61. PubMed ID: 12349926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector: reliability of digital image fusion regarding angle and distance measurements in long-leg radiography.
    Hamer OW, Strotzer M, Zorger N, Paetzel C, Lerch K, Feuerbach S, Völk M.
    Invest Radiol; 2004 May; 39(5):271-6. PubMed ID: 15087721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. [The value of digital imaging techniques in skeletal imaging].
    Lehmann KJ, Busch HP, Sommer A, Georgi M.
    Rofo; 1991 Mar; 154(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 1849297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.