These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

145 related items for PubMed ID: 9438507

  • 41. Flat-panel-detector-based volumetric CT: performance evaluation of imaging for skeletal structures of small animals in comparison to multislice CT.
    Obenauer S, Dullin C, Alves F, Missbach-Guentner J, Grabbe E, Heuser M.
    Clin Imaging; 2007; 31(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17189841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. [Experimental in vitro study to evaluate a flat-panel detector system].
    Meier S, Mildenberger P, Oberholzer K, Krummenauer F, Thelen M.
    Rofo; 2004 Jun; 176(6):875-9. PubMed ID: 15173983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. [Variation in X-ray dose quantity using an amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector -- a study on the dose reduction rate up to the limit of diagnostical utilization].
    Lehnert T, Wohlers J, Streng W, Manegold K, Wetter A, Jacobi V, Mack MG, Vogl TJ.
    Rofo; 2006 Mar; 178(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 16508834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Comparison of indirect CsI/a:Si and direct a:Se digital radiography. An assessment of contrast and detail visualization.
    Fischbach F, Freund T, Pech M, Werk M, Bassir C, Stoever B, Felix R, Ricke J.
    Acta Radiol; 2003 Nov; 44(6):616-21. PubMed ID: 14616206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Lumbar spine radiography: digital flat-panel detector versus screen-film and storage-phosphor systems in monkeys as a pediatric model.
    Ludwig K, Ahlers K, Wormanns D, Freund M, Bernhardt TM, Diederich S, Heindel W.
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 12925714
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
    Cowen AR, Davies AG, Sivananthan MU.
    Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Skeletal surveys for child abuse: comparison of interpretation using digitized images and screen-film radiographs.
    Youmans DC, Don S, Hildebolt C, Shackelford GD, Luker GD, McAlister WH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1415-9. PubMed ID: 9798889
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. [Flat-panel detector technology -State-of-the-art and future prospects-].
    Yamazaki T.
    Igaku Butsuri; 2002 Mar; 22(4):216-26. PubMed ID: 12766267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. [Image quality and exposure dose in digital projection radiography].
    Busch HP, Busch S, Decker C, Schilz C.
    Rofo; 2003 Jan; 175(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 12525978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.