These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

242 related items for PubMed ID: 9438746

  • 1. PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears: cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy.
    O'Leary TJ, Tellado M, Buckner SB, Ali IS, Stevens A, Ollayos CW.
    JAMA; 1998 Jan 21; 279(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9438746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Costs and outcomes of PAPNET secondary screening technology for cervical cytologic evaluation. A community hospital's experience.
    Brotzman GL, Kretzchmar S, Ferguson D, Gottlieb M, Stowe C.
    Arch Fam Med; 1999 Jan 21; 8(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 9932072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears.
    Koss LG, Lin E, Schreiber K, Elgert P, Mango L.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1994 Feb 21; 101(2):220-9. PubMed ID: 8116579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of the PAPNET system in a general pathology service.
    Farnsworth A, Chambers FM, Goldschmidt CS.
    Med J Aust; 1996 Oct 21; 165(8):429-31. PubMed ID: 8913244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: a comparative review of original and automated rescreen diagnosis of cervicovaginal smears with long term follow-up.
    Stastny JF, Remmers RE, London WB, Pedigo MA, Cahill LA, Ryan M, Frable WJ.
    Cancer; 1997 Dec 25; 81(6):348-53. PubMed ID: 9438460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Prospective study of PAPNET: review of 25,656 Pap smears negative on manual screening and rapid rescreening.
    Halford JA, Wright RG, Ditchmen EJ.
    Cytopathology; 1999 Oct 25; 10(5):317-23. PubMed ID: 10588350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Significant reduction in the rate of false-negative cervical smears with neural network-based technology (PAPNET Testing System).
    Koss LG, Sherman ME, Cohen MB, Anes AR, Darragh TM, Lemos LB, McClellan BJ, Rosenthal DL, Keyhani-Rofagha S, Schreiber K, Valente PT.
    Hum Pathol; 1997 Oct 25; 28(10):1196-203. PubMed ID: 9343327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Rescreening of atypical cervicovaginal smears using PAPNET.
    Lerma E, Colomo L, Carreras A, Esteva E, Quilez M, Prat J.
    Cancer; 1998 Dec 25; 84(6):361-5. PubMed ID: 9915138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. PAPNET-directed rescreening of cervicovaginal smears: a study of 101 cases of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
    Ryan MR, Stastny JF, Remmers R, Pedigo MA, Cahill LA, Frable WJ.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jun 25; 105(6):711-8. PubMed ID: 8659445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Papnet-assisted, primary screening of cervico-vaginal smears.
    Duggan MA.
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000 Jun 25; 21(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 10726616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Computer-assisted rescreening of clinically important false negative cervical smears using the PAPNET Testing System.
    Rosenthal DL, Acosta D, Peters RK.
    Acta Cytol; 1996 Jun 25; 40(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 8604564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Improved quality-control detection of false-negative Pap smears using the Autopap 300 QC system.
    Marshall CJ, Rowe L, Bentz JS.
    Diagn Cytopathol; 1999 Mar 25; 20(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 10086244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Neural-network-assisted analysis and microscopic rescreening in presumed negative cervical cytologic smears. A comparison.
    Mango LJ, Valente PT.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Mar 25; 42(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 9479345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cost analysis of PAPNET-assisted vs. conventional Pap smear evaluation in primary screening of cervical smears.
    Meerding WJ, Doornewaard H, van Ballegooijen M, Bos A, van der Graaf Y, van den Tweel JG, van der Schouw YT, Habbema JD.
    Acta Cytol; 2001 Mar 25; 45(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 11213501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Performance of a semiautomated Papanicolaou smear screening system: results of a population-based study conducted in Guanacaste, Costa Rica.
    Sherman ME, Schiffman M, Herrero R, Kelly D, Bratti C, Mango LJ, Alfaro M, Hutchinson ML, Mena F, Hildesheim A, Morales J, Greenberg MD, Balmaceda I, Lorincz AT.
    Cancer; 1998 Oct 25; 84(5):273-80. PubMed ID: 9801201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. PAPNET analysis of reportedly negative smears preceding the diagnosis of a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or carcinoma.
    Sherman ME, Mango LJ, Kelly D, Paull G, Ludin V, Copeland C, Solomon D, Schiffman MH.
    Mod Pathol; 1994 Jun 25; 7(5):578-81. PubMed ID: 7937724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Rescreen effect in conventional and PAPNET screening: observed in a study using material enriched with positive smears.
    van Ballegooijen M, Beck S, Boon ME, Boer R, Habbema JD.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Jun 25; 42(5):1133-8. PubMed ID: 9755670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [The PAPNET system in the rescreening of negative cervical/vaginal smears. A study from the Imola cytology laboratory].
    Ghidoni D, Fabbris E, Folicaldi S, Amadori A, Medri M, Bucchi L, Bondi A.
    Pathologica; 1998 Aug 25; 90(4):357-63. PubMed ID: 9793395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.