These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

125 related items for PubMed ID: 9442834

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Groningen, Nijdam and Provox voice prostheses: a prospective clinical comparison based on 845 replacements.
    Van Den Hoogen FJ, Oudes MJ, Hombergen G, Nijdam HF, Manni JJ.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1996 Jan; 116(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 8820362
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An apparatus to measure pressure, flow and speech parameters in patients producing speech using the Groningen valve prosthesis.
    Parker AJ, Stevens JC, Clegg RT.
    J Laryngol Otol; 1992 Oct; 106(10):896-9. PubMed ID: 1474312
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The ultra-low resistance Groningen voice prosthesis: aerodynamic properties.
    Chung RP, Geskus J, Mahieu HF.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1999 Oct; 120(4):245-8. PubMed ID: 10668359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Aerodynamic and sound intensity measurements in tracheoesophageal voice.
    Grolman W, Eerenstein SE, Tan FM, Tange RA, Schouwenburg PF.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2007 Oct; 69(2):68-76. PubMed ID: 17127821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Staffieri tracheo-oesophageal prosthesis for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy: an evaluation of characteristics.
    Belforte G, Carello M, Miani C, Staffieri A.
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1998 Nov; 36(6):754-60. PubMed ID: 10367468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Differences in aerodynamic characteristics of new and dysfunctional Provox 2 voice prostheses in vivo.
    Schwandt LQ, Tjong-Ayong HJ, van Weissenbruch R, der Mei HC, Albers FW.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 263(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 16421748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Aerodynamic studies of laryngectomees after the Amatsu tracheoesophageal shunt operation.
    Kinishi M, Amatsu M.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1986 Jun; 95(2 Pt 1):181-4. PubMed ID: 3963691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Difficulties in the fixation of prostheses for voice rehabilitation after laryngectomy.
    Ten Hallers EJ, Marres HA, Rakhorst G, Hagen R, Staffieri A, Van Der Laan BF, Van Der Houwen EB, Verkerke GJ.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Aug; 125(8):804-13. PubMed ID: 16158525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The ultra-low resistance Groningen voice prosthesis: clinical experiences.
    Chung RP, Dagli AS, Geskus J, de Bruin MD, Mahieu HF.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2001 Aug; 122(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 11715263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.