These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

212 related items for PubMed ID: 9444598

  • 1. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effects of an air-abrasive system on dental implants: a comparative in vitro study between machined and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces.
    Chairay JP, Boulekbache H, Jean A, Soyer A, Bouchard P.
    J Periodontol; 1997 Dec; 68(12):1215-22. PubMed ID: 9444598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of an air-powder abrasive system on plasma-sprayed titanium implant surfaces: an in vitro evaluation.
    Parham PL, Cobb CM, French AA, Love JW, Drisko CL, Killoy WJ.
    J Oral Implantol; 1989 Dec; 15(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 2640245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Contaminated implant surfaces: an in vitro comparison of implant surface coating and treatment modalities for decontamination.
    Dennison DK, Huerzeler MB, Quinones C, Caffesse RG.
    J Periodontol; 1994 Oct; 65(10):942-8. PubMed ID: 7823276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
    Colombo JS, Satoshi S, Okazaki J, Crean SJ, Sloan AJ, Waddington RJ.
    J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces.
    Cochran DL.
    J Periodontol; 1999 Dec; 70(12):1523-39. PubMed ID: 10632528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Characterization of five different implant surfaces and their effect on osseointegration: a study in dogs.
    Coelho PG, Bonfante EA, Pessoa RS, Marin C, Granato R, Giro G, Witek L, Suzuki M.
    J Periodontol; 2011 May; 82(5):742-50. PubMed ID: 21054223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants.
    Orsini G, Assenza B, Scarano A, Piattelli M, Piattelli A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000 May; 15(6):779-84. PubMed ID: 11151575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Bacterial adhesion on smooth and rough titanium surfaces after treatment with different instruments.
    Duarte PM, Reis AF, de Freitas PM, Ota-Tsuzuki C.
    J Periodontol; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1824-32. PubMed ID: 19905952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Titanium deposition after peri-implant care with the carbon dioxide laser.
    Deppe H, Greim H, Brill T, Wagenpfeil S.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002 Nov; 17(5):707-14. PubMed ID: 12381072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An in vitro and in vivo evaluation of bioactive titanium implants following sodium removal treatment.
    Fawzy AS, Amer MA.
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 18585776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.