These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


133 related items for PubMed ID: 9457185

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The 3D-based scaling index algorithm: a new structure measure to analyze trabecular bone architecture in high-resolution MR images in vivo.
    Mueller D, Link TM, Monetti R, Bauer J, Boehm H, Seifert-Klauss V, Rummeny EJ, Morfill GE, Raeth C.
    Osteoporos Int; 2006 Oct; 17(10):1483-93. PubMed ID: 16847587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Digital topological analysis of in vivo magnetic resonance microimages of trabecular bone reveals structural implications of osteoporosis.
    Wehrli FW, Gomberg BR, Saha PK, Song HK, Hwang SN, Snyder PJ.
    J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Aug; 16(8):1520-31. PubMed ID: 11499875
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Correlation of trabecular bone structure with age, bone mineral density, and osteoporotic status: in vivo studies in the distal radius using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging.
    Majumdar S, Genant HK, Grampp S, Newitt DC, Truong VH, Lin JC, Mathur A.
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jan; 12(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 9240733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The relationship between densitometry of the radius and vertebral fractures.
    van der Voort PH, Taconis WK, van Schaik CL, Silberbusch J.
    Neth J Med; 1990 Aug; 37(1-2):53-7. PubMed ID: 2215836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Trabecular structure quantified with the MRI-based virtual bone biopsy in postmenopausal women contributes to vertebral deformity burden independent of areal vertebral BMD.
    Ladinsky GA, Vasilic B, Popescu AM, Wald M, Zemel BS, Snyder PJ, Loh L, Song HK, Saha PK, Wright AC, Wehrli FW.
    J Bone Miner Res; 2008 Jan; 23(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 17784842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In vivo comparison between computed tomography and magnetic resonance image analysis of the distal radius in the assessment of osteoporosis.
    Cortet B, Boutry N, Dubois P, Bourel P, Cotten A, Marchandise X.
    J Clin Densitom; 2000 Jan; 3(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 10917740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Assessment of the skeletal status by MR relaxometry techniques of the lumbar spine: comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Maris TG, Damilakis J, Sideri L, Deimling M, Papadokostakis G, Papakonstantinou O, Gourtsoyiannis N.
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Jun; 50(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 15145484
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics.
    Majumdar S, Newitt D, Mathur A, Osman D, Gies A, Chiu E, Lotz J, Kinney J, Genant H.
    Osteoporos Int; 1996 Jun; 6(5):376-85. PubMed ID: 8931032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Osteoporosis: clinical assessment with quantitative MR imaging in diagnosis.
    Wehrli FW, Ford JC, Haddad JG.
    Radiology; 1995 Sep; 196(3):631-41. PubMed ID: 7644622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.