These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. [False negative Pap smears in a Danish material]. Ejersbo D, Dahl MB, Hølund B. Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun 02; 165(23):2391-4. PubMed ID: 12840998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Plea for quality cytological specimens in the screening of cervical cancer]. Marie G, Barjot P, Crouet H, von Theobald P, Soutif C, Levy G. Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun 02; 88(6):365-7. PubMed ID: 8351458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Common problems in Papanicolaou smear interpretation. DeMay RM. Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar 02; 121(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 9111106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The impending loss of screening for cervix uteri carcinoma in the Netherlands]. Lammes FB. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1986 Apr 12; 130(15):673-4. PubMed ID: 3703044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines for educational notes, disclaimers, and similar comments on reports of cervical cytology specimens. Papanicolau Society of Cytopathology Practice Guidelines Task Force. Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 May 12; 28(5):282-5. PubMed ID: 12722126 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]