These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

120 related items for PubMed ID: 9477035

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations.
    Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):60D-76D. PubMed ID: 11763920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Marginal adaptation of a sintered ceramic inlay system before and after cementation.
    Gemalmaz D, Ozcan M, Yoruç AB, Alkumru HN.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Sep; 24(9):646-51. PubMed ID: 9357744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Marginal and internal fit of four different types of ceramic inlays after luting. An in vitro study.
    Sjögren G.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1995 Feb; 53(1):24-8. PubMed ID: 7740927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Interface gap size of manually and CAD/CAM-manufactured ceramic inlays/onlays in vitro.
    Addi S, Hedayati-Khams A, Poya A, Sjögren G.
    J Dent; 2002 Jan; 30(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 11741736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of different curing approaches on marginal adaptation of ceramic inlays.
    Rechenberg DK, Göhring TN, Attin T.
    J Adhes Dent; 2010 Jun; 12(3):189-96. PubMed ID: 20157661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Influence of ultrasound application on inlays luting with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Cantoro A, Goracci C, Coniglio I, Magni E, Polimeni A, Ferrari M.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):617-23. PubMed ID: 20694567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays after six years: wear of luting composites.
    Krämer N, Frankenberger R.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Oct; 25(6):466-72. PubMed ID: 11203858
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Three-year evaluation of computer-machined ceramic inlays: influence of luting agent.
    Zuellig-Singer R, Bryant RW.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Sep; 29(9):573-82. PubMed ID: 9807141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives versus self-etch cements.
    Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Feb; 24(2):185-91. PubMed ID: 17544101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A 5-year clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays (Cerec) cemented with a dual-cured or chemically cured resin composite luting agent.
    Sjögren G, Molin M, van Dijken JW.
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1998 Oct; 56(5):263-7. PubMed ID: 9860093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Wear resistance of four luting agents as a function of marginal gap distance, cement type, and restorative material.
    Guzman AF, Moore BK, Andres CJ.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997 Oct; 10(5):415-25. PubMed ID: 9495160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Marginal gap, internal fit, and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques.
    Keshvad A, Hooshmand T, Asefzadeh F, Khalilinejad F, Alihemmati M, Van Noort R.
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Oct; 20(7):535-40. PubMed ID: 21806704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.