These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

168 related items for PubMed ID: 9479339

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The AutoCyte preparation system for gynecologic cytology.
    Howell LP, Davis RL, Belk TI, Agdigos R, Lowe J.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):171-7. PubMed ID: 9479336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. CytoRich liquid-based cervical cytologic test. Screening results in a routine cytopathology service.
    Vassilakos P, Griffin S, Megevand E, Campana A.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):198-202. PubMed ID: 9479340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of the CytoRich system with conventional cervical cytology. Preliminary data on 2,032 cases from a clinical trial site.
    Bishop JW.
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 9022721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Increased detection of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-based gynecologic cytology preparations. A review of accumulated data.
    Austin RM, Ramzy I.
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):178-84. PubMed ID: 9479337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. AutoCyte Prep system vs. conventional cervical cytology. Comparison based on 2,156 cases.
    Minge L, Fleming M, VanGeem T, Bishop JW.
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Mar; 45(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 10756493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Dual sampling of the endocervix and its impact on AutoCyte Prep endocervical adequacy.
    Day SJ, Deszo EL, Freund GG.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Jul; 118(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 12109854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy.
    Bergeron C, Bishop J, Lemarie A, Cas F, Ayivi J, Huynh B, Barrasso R.
    Acta Cytol; 2001 Jul; 45(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11480712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Multicenter comparison of manual and automated screening of AutoCyte gynecologic preparations.
    Bishop JW, Kaufman RH, Taylor DA.
    Acta Cytol; 1999 Jul; 43(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 9987448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A feasibility study of the AutoPap system location-guided screening.
    Lee JS, Kuan L, Oh S, Patten FW, Wilbur DC.
    Acta Cytol; 1998 Jul; 42(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9479344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.