These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

482 related items for PubMed ID: 9484051

  • 1. The effect of tooth preparation height and diameter on the resistance of complete crowns to fatigue loading.
    Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 9484051
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The relationship between abutment taper and resistance of cemented crowns to dynamic loading.
    Wiskott HW, Nicholls JI, Belser UC.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1996; 9(2):117-39. PubMed ID: 8639233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Optimizing preparation design for metal-free composite resin crowns.
    Ohlmann B, Gruber R, Eickemeyer G, Rammelsberg P.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 18762033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The influence of different cements on the fracture resistance and marginal adaptation of all-ceramic and fiber-reinforced crowns.
    Behr M, Rosentritt M, Mangelkramer M, Handel G.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Sep; 16(5):538-42. PubMed ID: 14651242
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE, Richards LC, Abbott JR.
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of tooth preparation taper and cement type on recementation strength of complete metal crowns.
    Ayad MF, Johnston WM, Rosenstiel SF.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):354-61. PubMed ID: 19961993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of luting cements for minimally retentive crown preparations.
    Browning WD, Nelson SK, Cibirka R, Myers ML.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Feb; 33(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 11890033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
    Bernal G, Okamura M, Muñoz CA.
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 12964683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the CeraOne implant system.
    Clayton GH, Driscoll CF, Hondrum SO.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997 Jun; 12(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 9337028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The influence of different cementation modes on the fracture resistance of feldspathic ceramic crowns.
    Groten M, Pröbster L.
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997 Jun; 10(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 9206458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J, Soliva-Garriga J, Campillo-Funollet M, Munoz-Viveros CA, Giner-Tarrida L.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Jun; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.