These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

437 related items for PubMed ID: 9484142

  • 21. In vitro comparison of filled and unfilled universal bonding agents of amalgam to dentin.
    Bagley A, Wakefield CW, Robbins JW.
    Oper Dent; 1994; 19(3):97-101. PubMed ID: 9028247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The influence of adhesive luting systems on bond strength and failure mode of an indirect micro ceramic resin-based composite veneer.
    Sarabi N, Ghavamnasiri M, Forooghbakhsh A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Jan 01; 10(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 19142254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Microleakage of a dental amalgam alloy bonding agent.
    Saiku JM, St Germain HA, Meiers JC.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Jan 01; 18(5):172-8. PubMed ID: 8152986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Microleakage of dentin-amalgam bonding agents.
    Turner EW, St Germain HA, Meiers JC.
    Am J Dent; 1995 Aug 01; 8(4):191-6. PubMed ID: 7576386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Fatigue of resin-bonded amalgam restorations.
    Bonilla E, White SN.
    Oper Dent; 1996 Aug 01; 21(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 9011846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Influence of c-factor and layering technique on microtensile bond strength to dentin.
    Nikolaenko SA, Lohbauer U, Roggendorf M, Petschelt A, Dasch W, Frankenberger R.
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul 01; 20(6):579-85. PubMed ID: 15134946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Influence of different surface treatments on the short-term bond strength and durability between a zirconia post and a composite resin core material.
    Akgungor G, Sen D, Aydin M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May 01; 99(5):388-99. PubMed ID: 18456050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The effect of dentin adhesive and cure mode on film thickness and microtensile bond strength to dentin in indirect restorations.
    Coelho Santos MJ, Navarro MF, Tam L, McComb D.
    Oper Dent; 2005 May 01; 30(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 15765957
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B.
    Oper Dent; 1999 May 01; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Interfacial bond strengths of amalgam bonded to amalgam and resin composite bonded to amalgam.
    Fruits TJ, Duncanson MG, Coury TL.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 May 01; 29(5):327-34. PubMed ID: 9693653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Effect of a resin-based desensitizing agent and a self-etching dentin adhesive on marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M, Alavi M, Alavi S.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Nov 01; 8(7):54-61. PubMed ID: 17994155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The effect of fibre insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite.
    Belli S, Erdemir A, Ozcopur M, Eskitascioglu G.
    Int Endod J; 2005 Feb 01; 38(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 15667628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM, Sudeep PT, Bhat KS.
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999 Feb 01; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb 01; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.