These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

102 related items for PubMed ID: 9490952

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Assessment of a technology that permits individualized scan delays on helical hepatic CT: a technique to improve efficiency in use of contrast material.
    Silverman PM, Roberts SC, Ducic I, Tefft MC, Olson MC, Cooper C, Zeman RK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 8659426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Hepatic enhancement analysis in children using smart prep monitoring for 2 : 1 pitch helical scanning.
    Vade A, Olson MC, Vittore CP, Subbaiah P.
    Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Sep; 29(9):689-93. PubMed ID: 10460331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics.
    Platt JF, Reige KA, Ellis JH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Jan; 172(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 9888738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Timing of parenchymal enhancement on dual-phase dynamic helical CT of the liver: how long does the hepatic arterial phase predominate?
    Frederick MG, McElaney BL, Singer A, Park KS, Paulson EK, McGee SG, Nelson RC.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jun; 166(6):1305-10. PubMed ID: 8633437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced spiral CT of the liver: effect of different amounts and injection rates of contrast material on early contrast enhancement.
    Small WC, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME, Brummer LT.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 8010255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Helical CT of the liver: clinical application of an automated computer technique, SmartPrep, for obtaining images with optimal contrast enhancement.
    Silverman PM, Roberts S, Tefft MC, Brown B, Fox SH, Cooper C, Zeman RK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Jul; 165(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 7785637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A comparison of two injection protocols using helical and dynamic acquisitions in CT examinations of the pancreas.
    Bonaldi VM, Bret PM, Atri M, Garcia P, Reinhold C.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jul; 167(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 8659419
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hepatic helical CT: contrast material injection protocol.
    Foley WD, Hoffmann RG, Quiroz FA, Kahn CE, Perret RS.
    Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):367-71. PubMed ID: 8029399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hepatic contrast enhancement at CT: influence of intravenous glucagon in a canine model.
    Warshauer DM, Hiken JN, Molina PL, Hackney SL, Bellinger DA, Lee JK.
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):365-8. PubMed ID: 7480678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Aortic and hepatic peak enhancement at CT: effect of contrast medium injection rate--pharmacokinetic analysis and experimental porcine model.
    Bae KT, Heiken JP, Brink JA.
    Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):455-64. PubMed ID: 9457200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.