These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

86 related items for PubMed ID: 9494478

  • 1. Spiral CT with ionic and nonionic contrast material: evaluation of patient motion and scan quality.
    Stockberger SM, Hicklin JA, Liang Y, Wass JL, Ambrosius WT.
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):631-6. PubMed ID: 9494478
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Objective measurement of motion in patients undergoing spiral CT examinations.
    Stockberger SM, Liang Y, Hicklin JA, Wass JL, Ambrosius WT, Kopecky KK.
    Radiology; 1998 Mar; 206(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 9494477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of iohexol 300 and diatrizoate meglumine 60 for body CT: image quality, adverse reactions, and aborted/repeated examinations.
    Bernardino ME, Fishman EK, Jeffrey RB, Brown PC.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):665-7. PubMed ID: 1739017
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. CT of the chest and abdomen in patients on mechanical pulmonary ventilators: quality of images made at 0.6 vs 1.0 sec.
    Posniak HV, Olson MC, Demos TC, Pierce KL, Kalbhen CL.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1073-7. PubMed ID: 7976877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Optimized contrast-enhanced CT protocols for diagnostic whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT: technical aspects of single-phase versus multiphase CT imaging.
    Brechtel K, Klein M, Vogel M, Mueller M, Aschoff P, Beyer T, Eschmann SM, Bares R, Claussen CD, Pfannenberg AC.
    J Nucl Med; 2006 Mar; 47(3):470-6. PubMed ID: 16513616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Single-detector helical CT in PET-CT: assessment of image quality.
    Römer W, Chung M, Chan A, Townsend DW, Torok F, McCook B, Federle MP, Avril N.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1571-7. PubMed ID: 15150012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Image quality and radiation exposure using different low-dose scan protocols in dual-source CT coronary angiography: randomized study.
    Neefjes LA, Dharampal AS, Rossi A, Nieman K, Weustink AC, Dijkshoorn ML, Ten Kate GJ, Dedic A, Papadopoulou SL, van Straten M, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ, Mollet NR.
    Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):779-86. PubMed ID: 21969666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. High-pitch electrocardiogram-triggered computed tomography of the chest: initial results.
    Lell M, Hinkmann F, Anders K, Deak P, Kalender WA, Uder M, Achenbach S.
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Nov; 44(11):728-33. PubMed ID: 19809339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients.
    Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM, Dodd GD, Miller WJ.
    Radiology; 1994 Mar; 190(3):721-5. PubMed ID: 8115618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Contrast media reactions and extravasation: relationship to intravenous injection rates.
    Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Langlotz CP.
    Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):411-6. PubMed ID: 9807567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A retrospective survey of delayed adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media.
    Yamaguchi K, Takanashi I, Kanauchi T, Hoshi T, Kubota H.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Nov 25; 52(11):1565-70. PubMed ID: 1465338
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
    Pomerantz SM, Daly B, Krebs TL, NessAiver M, Kepes SY, Wong JJ, Severson M, Siegler C.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov 25; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects.
    Wolf GL, Arenson RL, Cross AP.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 May 25; 152(5):939-44. PubMed ID: 2495706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise.
    Nakayama Y, Awai K, Funama Y, Hatemura M, Imuta M, Nakaura T, Ryu D, Morishita S, Sultana S, Sato N, Yamashita Y.
    Radiology; 2005 Dec 25; 237(3):945-51. PubMed ID: 16237140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Impact of different iodine concentrations on abdominal enhancement in biphasic multislice helical CT (MS-CT)].
    Engeroff B, Kopka L, Harz C, Grabbe E.
    Rofo; 2001 Oct 25; 173(10):938-41. PubMed ID: 11588683
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Forty-slice spiral computed tomography of the coronary arteries: assessment of image quality and diagnostic accuracy in a non-selected patient population.
    Grosse C, Globits S, Hergan K.
    Acta Radiol; 2007 Feb 25; 48(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 17325923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Ionic versus nonionic contrast media solvents used with an epirubicin-based agent for transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Tzeng WS, Wu RH, Chang SC, Chou CK, Lin CY, Chen JJ, Yang SC, Lin CH.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Mar 25; 19(3):342-50. PubMed ID: 18295692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Diagnostic efficacy of excretory urography with low-dose, nonionic contrast media.
    Gavant ML, Ellis JV, Klesges LM.
    Radiology; 1992 Mar 25; 182(3):657-60. PubMed ID: 1535877
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Spiral CT of the abdomen: artifacts and potential pitfalls.
    Herts BR, Einstein DM, Paushter DM.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec 25; 161(6):1185-90. PubMed ID: 8249723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of contrast concentration on abdominal enhancement in the rabbit: spiral computed tomography evaluation.
    Bluemke DA, Fishman EK, Anderson JH.
    Acad Radiol; 1995 Mar 25; 2(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 9419553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.