These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

125 related items for PubMed ID: 9502127

  • 1. In vitro bacterial adherence onto pellicle-coated aesthetic restorative materials.
    Shahal Y, Steinberg D, Hirschfeld Z, Bronshteyn M, Kopolovic K.
    J Oral Rehabil; 1998 Jan; 25(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 9502127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of salivary biofilm on the adherence of oral bacteria to bleached and non-bleached restorative material.
    Steinberg D, Mor C, Dogan H, Zacks B, Rotstein I.
    Dent Mater; 1999 Jan; 15(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 10483391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Adhesion of oral streptococci to all-ceramics dental restorative materials in vitro.
    Meier R, Hauser-Gerspach I, Lüthy H, Meyer J.
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2008 Oct; 19(10):3249-53. PubMed ID: 18470704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Early formation of Streptococcus sobrinus biofilm on various dental restorative materials.
    Steinberg D, Eyal S.
    J Dent; 2002 Jan; 30(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 11741735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Surface characteristics of orthodontic materials and their effects on adhesion of mutans streptococci.
    Lee SP, Lee SJ, Lim BS, Ahn SJ.
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Mar; 79(2):353-60. PubMed ID: 19216592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biofilm formation and release of fluoride from dental restorative materials in relation to their surface properties.
    Hahnel S, Ionescu AC, Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Brambilla E.
    J Dent; 2017 May; 60():14-24. PubMed ID: 28212980
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Adhesion of actinomyces isolates to experimental pellicles.
    Steinberg D, Kopec LK, Bowen WH.
    J Dent Res; 1993 Jun; 72(6):1015-20. PubMed ID: 8496474
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of water storage of E-glass fiber-reinforced composite on adhesion of Streptococcus mutans.
    Tanner J, Vallittu PK, Söderling E.
    Biomaterials; 2001 Jun; 22(12):1613-8. PubMed ID: 11374462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F, Yondem I, Ozyesil AG, Gunal SK, Avunduk MC, Ozkan S.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Surface characteristics and in vitro biofilm formation on glass ionomer and composite resin.
    Carlén A, Nikdel K, Wennerberg A, Holmberg K, Olsson J.
    Biomaterials; 2001 Mar; 22(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 11214759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to various restorative materials in a continuous flow system.
    Eick S, Glockmann E, Brandl B, Pfister W.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 15025662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Saliva mediated adherence, aggregation and prevalence in dental plaque of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis and Actinomyces spp, in young and elderly humans.
    Carlén A, Olsson J, Ramberg P.
    Arch Oral Biol; 1996 Dec; 41(12):1133-40. PubMed ID: 9134102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Transmission electron microscopic study of in vivo pellicle formation on dental restorative materials.
    Hannig M.
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1997 Oct; 105(5 Pt 1):422-33. PubMed ID: 9395103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A, Sahafi A, Flury S.
    Oper Dent; 2011 Oct; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Influence of different resin-based restorative materials on mutans streptococci adhesion. An in vitro study.
    Osorio E, Osorio R, Toledano M, Quevedo-Sarmiento J, Ruiz-Bravo A.
    Am J Dent; 2010 Oct; 23(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 21207795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Incorporation of caseinoglycomacropeptide and caseinophosphopeptide into the salivary pellicle inhibits adherence of mutans streptococci.
    Schüpbach P, Neeser JR, Golliard M, Rouvet M, Guggenheim B.
    J Dent Res; 1996 Oct; 75(10):1779-88. PubMed ID: 8955673
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to an E-glass fiber-reinforced composite and conventional restorative materials used in prosthetic dentistry.
    Tanner J, Vallittu PK, Söderling E.
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2000 Feb; 49(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 10571913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Adherence of Streptococcus mutans to uncoated and saliva-coated glass-ceramics and composites.
    Kantorski KZ, Scotti R, Valandro LF, Bottino MA, Koga-Ito CY, Jorge AO.
    Gen Dent; 2008 Feb; 56(7):740-7; quiz 748-9, 768. PubMed ID: 19014037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.
    Shabanian M, Richards LC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 12131888
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
    Mei L, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Ren Y.
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.