These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
132 related items for PubMed ID: 9508025
1. Conditioning the auditory system with continuous vs. interrupted noise of equal acoustic energy: is either exposure more protective? Skellett RA, Cullen JK, Fallon M, Bobbin RP. Hear Res; 1998 Feb; 116(1-2):21-32. PubMed ID: 9508025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The protective effect of conditioning on noise-induced hearing loss is frequency-dependent. Pourbakht A, Imani A. Acta Med Iran; 2012 Feb; 50(10):664-9. PubMed ID: 23275293 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions study of the noise-induced toughening effect in rats. Sánchez Fernandez JM, Martínez Ibargüen A, Orbegozo Etxebarría E, Sánchez Del Rey A, Santaolalla Montoya F. Acta Otolaryngol; 2003 Jan; 123(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 12701731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Sound conditioning reduces noise-induced permanent threshold shift in mice. Yoshida N, Liberman MC. Hear Res; 2000 Oct; 148(1-2):213-9. PubMed ID: 10978838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Is there a close relationship between changes in amplitudes of distortion product otoacoustic emissions and hair cell damage after exposure to realistic industrial noise in guinea pigs? Linss V, Emmerich E, Richter F, Linss W. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 262(6):488-95. PubMed ID: 15592860 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. DPOAE level shifts and ABR threshold shifts compared to detailed analysis of histopathological damage from noise. Harding GW, Bohne BA, Ahmad M. Hear Res; 2002 Dec; 174(1-2):158-71. PubMed ID: 12433407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Measures of auditory brain-stem responses, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, hair cell loss, and forward masked tuning curves in the waltzing guinea pig. Canlon B, Marklund K, Borg E. J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3232-43. PubMed ID: 8300958 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Effectiveness of intermittent and continuous acoustic stimulation in preventing noise-induced hearing and hair cell loss. White DR, Boettcher FA, Miles LR, Gratton MA. J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Mar; 103(3):1566-72. PubMed ID: 9514020 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Recovery of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions after a 2-kHz monaural sound-exposure in humans: effects on fine structures. Aranda de Toro MA, Ordoñez R, Reuter K, Hammershøi D. J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3568-76. PubMed ID: 21218889 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of repeated daily noise exposure on sound-conditioned and unconditioned guinea pigs. Dagli S, Canlon B. Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):39-46. PubMed ID: 9119765 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of usage of personal music systems on oto-acoustic emissions among medical students. Narahari PG, Bhat J, Nambi A, Arora A. Noise Health; 2017 Feb; 19(90):222-226. PubMed ID: 28937016 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Protection against noise trauma by sound conditioning. Canlon B. Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 Apr; 76(4):248-50, 253-5. PubMed ID: 9127524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]