These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
162 related items for PubMed ID: 9511601
21. A 3-year longitudinal, controlled clinical study of a gallium-based restorative material. Dunne SM, Abraham R, Pankhurst CL. Br Dent J; 2005 Mar 26; 198(6):355-9; discussion 348. PubMed ID: 15789103 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite in class V carious lesions: 3-year results. Demirci M, Ersev H, Topçubaşi M, Uçok M. Dent Mater J; 2005 Sep 26; 24(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 16279721 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. One-year clinical evaluation of two composite materials used for anterior class V restorations. Sakrana AA, Tanoue N, Kawasaki K, Matsumura H. J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Oct 26; 31(10):985-90. PubMed ID: 15387839 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. One-year comparison of metallic and translucent matrices in Class II composite resin restorations. Cenci MS, Demarco FF, Pereira CL, Lund RG, de Carvalho RM. Am J Dent; 2007 Feb 26; 20(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 17380807 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years. Smales RJ, Wetherell JD. Oper Dent; 2000 Feb 26; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions. Koubi S, Raskin A, Bukiet F, Pignoly C, Toca E, Tassery H. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov 01; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. One year clinical evaluation of two different types of composite resins in posterior teeth. Gianordoli Neto R, Santiago SL, Mendonça JS, Passos VF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May 01; 9(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 18473024 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Bond strengths of the adhesive resin-amalgam interface. Ruzicková T, Staninec M, Marshall GW, Hutton JE. Am J Dent; 1997 Aug 01; 10(4):192-4. PubMed ID: 9590907 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations. Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW. Oper Dent; 2004 Aug 01; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study. Abraham MM, Sudeep PT, Bhat KS. Indian J Dent Res; 1999 Aug 01; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]