These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
343 related items for PubMed ID: 9511639
21. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results. Demirci M, Ersev H, Uçok M. Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations. Duncalf WV, Wilson NH. Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [A comparative evaluation of the technological characteristics of working with metal-containing filling materials in the clinic]. Iankevich OV. Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1997 May; 76(6):16-8. PubMed ID: 9471804 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Four-year clinical evaluation of a self-etching primer and resin-based restorative material. Gordan VV, Shen C, Watson RE, Mjor IA. Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 15810481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Surface roughness and gloss of dental materials as a function of force and polishing time in vitro. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Rousson V. Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):146-65. PubMed ID: 16084582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects. Setcos JC, Staninec M, Wilson NH. Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. [A finely dispersed copper alloy for amalgams--a prospective filling material in pediatric dentistry. II. Clinical research]. Pobochina VV, Chuev VP. Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1994 Feb; 73(3):62-5. PubMed ID: 7846721 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP. Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions. Brackett WW, Browning WD, Ross JA, Gregory PN, Owens BM. Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Five-year clinical evaluation of Dyract in small Class I cavities. Demirci M, Sancakli HS. Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16555657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years. Smales RJ, Wetherell JD. Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Mair LH. Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):483-90. PubMed ID: 9807127 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6-year results. Busato AL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Carrilho MR. Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):304-8. PubMed ID: 11803995 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Alloy particle shape and sensitivity of high-copper amalgams to manipulative variables. Brown IH, Miller DR. Am J Dent; 1993 Oct; 6(5):248-54. PubMed ID: 7880469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Resistance to traction forces in different brands of amalgam]. Spanauf AJ, Vermeersch AG, Vrijhoef MM. Rev Belge Med Dent; 1976 Oct; 31(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 1070057 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study. Abraham MM, Sudeep PT, Bhat KS. Indian J Dent Res; 1999 Oct; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]