These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

431 related items for PubMed ID: 9515442

  • 1. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 1: SEM study of in vivo bonded amalgam restorations.
    Staninec M, Marshall GW, Lowe A, Ruzickova T.
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):356-60, 362. PubMed ID: 9515442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical research on bonded amalgam restorations. Part 2: Further studies and clinical technique.
    Staninec M, Marshall GW, Lowe A, Ruzickova T.
    Gen Dent; 1997; 45(4):361-2. PubMed ID: 9515443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Bonding of amalgam restorations: existing knowledge and future prospects.
    Setcos JC, Staninec M, Wilson NH.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 11203798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. SEM study of a self-etching primer adhesive system used for dentin bonding in primary and permanent teeth.
    da Silva Telles PD, Aparecida M, Machado M, Nör JE.
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 11572489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Observation of an amalgam-bonded tooth through a scanning electron microscope.
    Orosa JL.
    N Y State Dent J; 2003; 69(6):29-31. PubMed ID: 13677864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Bond strength and clinical evaluation of a new dentinal bonding agent to amalgam and resin composite.
    Olmez A, Ulusu T.
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Nov; 26(11):785-93. PubMed ID: 8628838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Residual interface tensile strength of ceramic bonded to dentin after cyclic loading and aging.
    Hernandez AI, Roongruangphol T, Katsube N, Seghi RR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):209-17. PubMed ID: 18319092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Marginal integrity of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Tarim B, Suzuki S, Suzuki S, Cox CF.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):72-6. PubMed ID: 9522690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM, Sudeep PT, Bhat KS.
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999 Apr; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M, Friedrichs C.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Apr; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Apr; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indirect restorations.
    Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Dec; 94(6):511-9. PubMed ID: 16316797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of shear bond strength and interfacial micromorphology of direct restorations in primary and permanent teeth--an in vitro study.
    da Costa CC, Oshima HM, Costa Filho LC.
    Gen Dent; 2008 Dec; 56(1):85-93; quiz 94-5, 111-2. PubMed ID: 18254567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement.
    Magne P, So WS, Cascione D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):166-74. PubMed ID: 17854617
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: an alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding.
    Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Sep; 24(3):172-80. PubMed ID: 10530279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Sep; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of adhesive volume on the bond strength of bonded complex amalgam restorations.
    Overton JD, Vance RI.
    Am J Dent; 2005 Dec; 18(6):320-2. PubMed ID: 16433399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Direct dentin bonding technique sensitivity when using air/suction drying steps.
    Magne P, Mahallati R, Bazos P, So WS.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2008 Dec; 20(2):130-8; discussion 139-40. PubMed ID: 18380845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of different adhesive systems on the retention strength of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Ghavamnasiri M, Moosavi H.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb 01; 9(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18264531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.