These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
391 related items for PubMed ID: 9522758
1. Effect of 4-META adhesive on bond strength and marginal seal of amalgam restorations and repairs--an in vitro study. George S, Kuriakose S, Jayalatha NS. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1996 Jun; 14(2):52-5. PubMed ID: 9522758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage. Marchiori S, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Monteiro Júnior S, Ritter AV. Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Characterization of dentin-bonding-amalgam interfaces. Geiger SB, Mazor Y, Klein E, Judes H. Oper Dent; 2001 Sep; 26(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 11357565 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bonding of amalgam to dentine: microleakage and shear bond strength evaluation. van der Vyver PJ, de Wet FA, Kearney WD, de Nysschen D. J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1996 Aug; 51(8):531-5. PubMed ID: 9461930 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro evaluation of the use of resin liners to reduce microleakage and improve retention of amalgam restorations. Charlton DG, Moore BK, Swartz ML. Oper Dent; 1992 Aug; 17(3):112-9. PubMed ID: 1437693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage. Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ, Smale I. Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):229-34. PubMed ID: 10388382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro comparison of the shear bond strength of amalgam to tooth structure using two bonding agents--lutting glass ionomer and 4-META. Sheela K, Sudeep PT, Hegde V, Francis RF, Bhat KS. Indian J Dent Res; 1998 Oct; 9(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 10530186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations. Owens BM. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb 15; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling. Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y, Karezis A. Oper Dent; 2000 Feb 15; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP. Oper Dent; 2000 Feb 15; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives. Uludag B, Ozturk O, Ozturk AN. J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct 15; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study. Abraham MM, Sudeep PT, Bhat KS. Indian J Dent Res; 1999 Oct 15; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Strength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations. Puckett AD, Holder R, O'Hara JW. Oper Dent; 1991 Oct 15; 16(4):136-40. PubMed ID: 1805182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage of a dental amalgam alloy bonding agent. Saiku JM, St Germain HA, Meiers JC. Oper Dent; 1993 Oct 15; 18(5):172-8. PubMed ID: 8152986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]