These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

215 related items for PubMed ID: 9532750

  • 21. A collateral effect of reward predicted by matching theory.
    Mace FC, McCurdy B, Quigley EA.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1990; 23(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 2373655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. A comparison of behavioral techniques to teach functional independent-living skills to individuals with severe and profound mental retardation.
    Matson JL, Smalls Y, Hampff A, Smiroldo BB, Anderson SJ.
    Behav Modif; 1998 Jul; 22(3):298-306. PubMed ID: 9670802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Too much reinforcement, too little behavior: assessing task interspersal procedures in conjunction with different reinforcement schedules with autistic children.
    Charlop MH, Kurtz PF, Milstein JP.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1992 Jul; 25(4):795-808. PubMed ID: 1478903
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Reducing overselective attention to compound visual cues with extended training in adolescents with severe mental retardation.
    Huguenin NH.
    Res Dev Disabil; 2000 Jul; 21(2):93-113. PubMed ID: 10817417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Response rates and choices of schizophrenics under fixed-ratio contingencies of reinforcement.
    Weiner H.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Dec; 51(3 Pt 2):1239-43. PubMed ID: 7220225
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Emergence of reinforcer preference as a function of schedule requirements and stimulus similarity.
    DeLeon IG, Iwata BA, Goh HL, Worsdell AS.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997 Dec; 30(3):439-49. PubMed ID: 9378681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Extended pausing by humans on multiple fixed-ratio schedules with varied reinforcer magnitude and response requirements.
    Williams DC, Saunders KJ, Perone M.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2011 Mar; 95(2):203-20. PubMed ID: 21541121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Response-restriction analysis: II. Alteration of activity preferences.
    Hanley GP, Iwata BA, Roscoe EM, Thompson RH, Lindberg JS.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003 Mar; 36(1):59-76. PubMed ID: 12723867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The use of response deprivation to increase the academic performance of EMR students.
    Konarski EA, Crowell CR, Duggan LM.
    Appl Res Ment Retard; 1985 Mar; 6(1):15-31. PubMed ID: 3994358
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The several roles of stimuli in token reinforcement.
    Bullock CE, Hackenberg TD.
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2015 Mar; 103(2):269-87. PubMed ID: 25604188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Interaction of reinforcement schedules, a behavioral prosthesis, and work-related behavior in adults with mental retardation.
    Saunders RR, McEntee JE, Saunders MD.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2005 Mar; 38(2):163-76. PubMed ID: 16033164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Analysis of activity preferences as a function of differential consequences.
    Hanley GP, Iwata BA, Lindberg JS.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999 Mar; 32(4):419-35. PubMed ID: 10641298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. A comparison of reinforcement schedules to increase independent responding in individuals with intellectual disabilities.
    Hausman NL, Ingvarsson ET, Kahng S.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014 Mar; 47(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 24114759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.
    Hanley GP, Iwata BA, Lindberg JS, Conners J.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2003 Mar; 36(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 12723866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. An evaluation of the effects of matched stimuli on behaviors maintained by automatic reinforcement.
    Piazza CC, Adelinis JD, Hanley GP, Goh HL, Delia MD.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2000 Mar; 33(1):13-27. PubMed ID: 10738949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Differential reinforcement of correct responses to probes and prompts in picture-name training with severely retarded children.
    Olenick DL, Pear JJ.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1980 Mar; 13(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 6444932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Increasing self-determination: teaching people with mental retardation to evaluate residential options.
    Faw GD, Davis PK, Peck C.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1996 Mar; 29(2):173-88. PubMed ID: 8682735
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. An integrated model for guiding the selection of treatment components for problem behavior maintained by automatic reinforcement.
    Berg WK, Wacker DP, Ringdahl JE, Stricker J, Vinquist K, Salil Kumar Dutt A, Dolezal D, Luke J, Kemmerer L, Mews J.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2016 Sep; 49(3):617-38. PubMed ID: 26990962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Human choice under schedules of negative reinforcement.
    Alessandri J, Cançado CR.
    Behav Processes; 2015 Dec; 121():70-3. PubMed ID: 26518610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.
    Fisher WW, Thompson RH, Piazza CC, Crosland K, Gotjen D.
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997 Dec; 30(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 9316257
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.