These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

670 related items for PubMed ID: 9545879

  • 21. Antibacterial activity of resin adhesives, glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer in contact with dentin caries samples.
    Herrera M, Castillo A, Bravo M, Liébana J, Carrión P.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 11203829
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effect of low-viscosity resins on the performance of dental adhesives.
    Swift EJ, Triolo PT, Barkmeier WW, Bird JL, Bounds SJ.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):100-4. PubMed ID: 9002798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. An in vitro comparison of four surface preparation techniques for veneering a compomer to stainless steel.
    Salama FS, el-Mallakh BF.
    Pediatr Dent; 1997 Jun; 19(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 9200199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage.
    Santini A, Mitchell S.
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 10388380
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Enamel and dentin bond strengths of single application bonding systems.
    Miyazaki S, Iwasaki K, Onose H, Moore BK.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Dec; 14(6):361-6. PubMed ID: 11949795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Marginal leakage of combinations of glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations.
    Sarne S, Mante MO, Mante FK.
    J Clin Dent; 1996 Dec; 7(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 9238879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
    Uludag B, Ozturk O, Ozturk AN.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Bonding efficiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives.
    Fritz UB, Finger WJ.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):277-82. PubMed ID: 10850246
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation.
    Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Dec; 25(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 11203784
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Longevity of bonds made by composite and polyacid-modified resins to dentin using a dual-cured adhesive system.
    Osorio R, Toledano M, Osorio E, Tay FR.
    Am J Dent; 2005 Feb; 18(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 15810476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions.
    Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA, García-Godoy F.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9545915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Wang L, Sakai VT, Kawai ES, Buzalaf MA, Atta MT.
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 16457670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparison of microleakage on one composite etched with phosphoric acid or a combination of phosphoric and hydrofluoric acids and bonded with several different systems.
    Szep S, Langner N, Bayer S, Börnichen D, Schulz C, Gerhardt T, Schriever A, Becker J, Heidemann D.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 12616236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations using five simplified adhesive systems.
    Cardoso PE, Placido E, Francci CE, Perdigão J.
    Am J Dent; 1999 Dec; 12(6):291-4. PubMed ID: 10850249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents.
    Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchell S.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):132-6. PubMed ID: 11572288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer.
    Payne JH.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999 Jun; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Enhanced bond strengths of compomers using two dentin bonding systems.
    Somphone P, Pereira PN, Nikaido T, Tagami J.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Oct; 15(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 12537344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Bond strengths of composite resin and compomers in primary and permanent teeth.
    Jumlongras D, White GE.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997 Oct; 21(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 9484131
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH, Schmalz G, Hiller KA, Mortazavi F.
    Oper Dent; 1997 Oct; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 34.