These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

171 related items for PubMed ID: 9545921

  • 1. Effect of fit adjustment on CEREC CAD-CAM veneers.
    White SN, Suh PS, Yu Z, Johnson R.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 9545921
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fit of veneers made by CAD-CAM and platinum foil methods.
    Suh PS, Johnson R, White SN.
    Oper Dent; 1997 Feb; 22(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 9484150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Marginal fit and short-term clinical performance of porcelain-veneered CICERO, CEREC, and Procera onlays.
    Denissen H, Dozić A, van der Zel J, van Waas M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):506-13. PubMed ID: 11105006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Full-ceramic CAD/CIM anterior crowns and copings.
    Bindl A, Windisch S, Mörmann WH.
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Apr; 2(2):97-111. PubMed ID: 11351494
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical long-term results with 617 Cerec veneers: a nine-year report.
    Wiedhahn K, Kerschbaum T, Fasbinder DF.
    Int J Comput Dent; 2005 Jul; 8(3):233-46. PubMed ID: 16416936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns.
    Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003 Jul; 16(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 12854786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Internal adaptation, marginal accuracy and microleakage of a pressable versus a machinable ceramic laminate veneers.
    Aboushelib MN, Elmahy WA, Ghazy MH.
    J Dent; 2012 Aug; 40(8):670-7. PubMed ID: 22542500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A comparison of the marginal and internal fit of porcelain laminate veneers fabricated by pressing and CAD-CAM milling and cemented with 2 different resin cements.
    Al-Dwairi ZN, Alkhatatbeh RM, Baba NZ, Goodacre CJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):470-476. PubMed ID: 30391059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Marginal adaptation of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM composite crowns using two different finish line preparation designs.
    Akbar JH, Petrie CS, Walker MP, Williams K, Eick JD.
    J Prosthodont; 2006 Mar; 15(3):155-63. PubMed ID: 16681497
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of marginal fidelity and surface roughness of porcelain veneers fabricated by refractory die and pressing techniques.
    Jha R, Jain V, Das TK, Shah N, Pruthi G.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Aug; 22(6):439-44. PubMed ID: 23551705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF, Chitmongkolsuk S, Silva NR, Att W, Strub JR.
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparisons of fit of CAD-CAM restorations using three imaging surfaces.
    Hembree JH.
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):145-7. PubMed ID: 7568725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of ceramic color and translucency on shade match of CAD/CAM porcelain veneers.
    Salameh Z, Tehini G, Ziadeh N, Ragab HA, Berberi A, Aboushelib MN.
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014 Feb; 9(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 24757701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of CEREC II and CEREC III inlays.
    Estafan D, Dussetschleger F, Agosta C, Reich S.
    Gen Dent; 2003 Feb; 51(5):450-4. PubMed ID: 15055635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Marginal adaptation of three different zirconium dioxide three-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Att W, Komine F, Gerds T, Strub JR.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):239-47. PubMed ID: 19328277
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fracture resistance and marginal discrepancy of porcelain laminate veneers influenced by preparation design and restorative material in vitro.
    Lin TM, Liu PR, Ramp LC, Essig ME, Givan DA, Pan YH.
    J Dent; 2012 Mar; 40(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 22198195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. An overview of the CEREC 3D CAD/CAM system.
    Allen KL, Schenkel AB, Estafan D.
    Gen Dent; 2004 Mar; 52(3):234-5. PubMed ID: 15206254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Heat-Pressed and CAD/CAM Porcelain Laminate Veneers and a 2-Year Follow-Up.
    Yuce M, Ulusoy M, Turk AG.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Jun; 28(5):504-510. PubMed ID: 29271526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A, Abdelaziz KM, Freitag S, Kern M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles.
    Vigolo P, Fonzi F.
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):621-6. PubMed ID: 18798783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.