These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

889 related items for PubMed ID: 9547752

  • 21. Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data.
    Defrise M, Kinahan PE, Townsend DW, Michel C, Sibomana M, Newport DF.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Apr; 16(2):145-58. PubMed ID: 9101324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Use of a fast EM algorithm for 3D image reconstruction with the YAP-PET tomograph.
    Motta A, Damiani C, Del Guerra A, Di Domenico G, Zavattini G.
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2002 Apr; 26(5):293-302. PubMed ID: 12204233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Noise reduction in oncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction: a quantitative assessment.
    Riddell C, Carson RE, Carrasquillo JA, Libutti SK, Danforth DN, Whatley M, Bacharach SL.
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):1316-23. PubMed ID: 11535719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Using an external gating signal to estimate noise in PET with an emphasis on tracer avid tumors.
    Schmidtlein CR, Beattie BJ, Bailey DL, Akhurst TJ, Wang W, Gönen M, Kirov AS, Humm JL.
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct 21; 55(20):6299-326. PubMed ID: 20924132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of parametric FBP and OS-EM reconstruction algorithm images for PET dynamic study.
    Oda K, Toyama H, Uemura K, Ikoma Y, Kimura Y, Senda M.
    Ann Nucl Med; 2001 Oct 21; 15(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 11758946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Anatomical-based FDG-PET reconstruction for the detection of hypo-metabolic regions in epilepsy.
    Baete K, Nuyts J, Van Paesschen W, Suetens P, Dupont P.
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Apr 21; 23(4):510-9. PubMed ID: 15084076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Optimization of image reconstruction conditions with phantoms for brain FDG and amyloid PET imaging.
    Akamatsu G, Ikari Y, Nishio T, Nishida H, Ohnishi A, Aita K, Sasaki M, Sasaki M, Senda M.
    Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Jan 21; 30(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 26337533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. PET imaging with yttrium-86: comparison of phantom measurements acquired with different PET scanners before and after applying background subtraction.
    Buchholz HG, Herzog H, Förster GJ, Reber H, Nickel O, Rösch F, Bartenstein P.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 May 21; 30(5):716-20. PubMed ID: 12605273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Performance of list mode data acquisition with ECAT EXACT HR and ECAT EXACT HR+ positron emission scanners.
    Watabe H, Matsumoto K, Senda M, Iida H.
    Ann Nucl Med; 2006 Apr 21; 20(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 16715949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Quantitative accuracy of MAP reconstruction for dynamic PET imaging in small animals.
    Cheng JC, Shoghi K, Laforest R.
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb 21; 39(2):1029-41. PubMed ID: 22320813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Implementation and evaluation of an ordered subsets reconstruction algorithm for transmission PET studies using median root prior and inter-update median filtering.
    Bettinardi V, Alenius S, Numminen P, Teräs M, Gilardi MC, Fazio F, Ruotsalainen U.
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Feb 21; 30(2):222-31. PubMed ID: 12552340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [Investigation of the signal-to-noise ratio on a state-of-the-art PET system: measurements with the EEC whole-body phantom].
    Jägel M, Adam LE, Bellemann ME, Zaers J, Trojan H, Rauschnabel K, Brix G.
    Nuklearmedizin; 1998 Aug 21; 37(5):171-6. PubMed ID: 9728344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Impact of acquisition geometry, image processing, and patient size on lesion detection in whole-body 18F-FDG PET.
    El Fakhri G, Santos PA, Badawi RD, Holdsworth CH, Van Den Abbeele AD, Kijewski MF.
    J Nucl Med; 2007 Dec 21; 48(12):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18006613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Bootstrap methods for estimating PET image noise: experimental validation and an application to evaluation of image reconstruction algorithms.
    Ibaraki M, Matsubara K, Nakamura K, Yamaguchi H, Kinoshita T.
    Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Feb 21; 28(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 24158790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. The usefulness of fully three-dimensional OSEM algorithm on lymph node metastases from lung cancer with 18F-FDG PET/CT.
    Inoue K, Moriya E, Suzuki T, Ohnuki Y, Sato T, Kitamura H, Sasaki T, Fukushi M, Moriyama N, Fujii H.
    Ann Nucl Med; 2011 May 21; 25(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 21234724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. OS-EM and FBP reconstructions at low count rates: effect on 3D PET studies of [11C] WAY-100635.
    Bélanger MJ, Mann JJ, Parsey RV.
    Neuroimage; 2004 Jan 21; 21(1):244-50. PubMed ID: 14741662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Data acquisition in PET imaging.
    Fahey FH.
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2002 Jun 21; 30(2):39-49. PubMed ID: 12055275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 45.