These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

186 related items for PubMed ID: 9553545

  • 1. Assessment of neuroforaminal decompression in degenerative spinal stenosis.
    Gill TJ, Mason MD.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):135-9. PubMed ID: 9553545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Biomechanical aspects of surgical treatment of secondary stenosis of the spinal canal in the lumbosacral region].
    Król R.
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1992 Mar; 38():97-112. PubMed ID: 1290356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biomechanical assessment of minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a cadaver study.
    Hamasaki T, Tanaka N, Kim J, Okada M, Ochi M, Hutton WC.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Oct; 22(7):486-91. PubMed ID: 20075811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in younger age patients could lead to higher stresses in the remaining neural arch -- a finite element investigation.
    Ivanov A, Faizan A, Sairyo K, Ebraheim N, Biyani A, Goel VK.
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Feb; 50(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17546538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bilateral interlaminar fenestration and unroofing for the decompression of nerve roots by using a unilateral approach in lumbar canal stenosis.
    Iwatsuki K, Yoshimine T, Aoki M.
    Surg Neurol; 2007 Nov; 68(5):487-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17825382
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The effect of removing the lateral part of the pars interarticularis on stress distribution at the neural arch in lumbar foraminal microdecompression at L3-L4 and L4-L5: anatomic and finite element investigations.
    Ivanov AA, Faizan A, Ebraheim NA, Yeasting R, Goel VK.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct 15; 32(22):2462-6. PubMed ID: 18090086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Bilateral "over the top" decompression through unilateral laminotomy for lumbar and thoracic spinal canal stenosis].
    Banczerowski P, Lipóth L, Veres R.
    Ideggyogy Sz; 2007 Nov 30; 60(11-12):467-73. PubMed ID: 18198793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Hatta Y, Shiraishi T, Sakamoto A, Yato Y, Harada T, Mikami Y, Hase H, Kubo T.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr 15; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Preliminary application of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion with prospace and facet fusion using local autograft.
    Long H, Kazunasa U, Liu S, Akio S, Taito I.
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Nov 15; 21(11):1155-9. PubMed ID: 18069464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
    Rahman M, Summers LE, Richter B, Mimran RI, Jacob RP.
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr 15; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Minimally invasive lumbar laminectomy via a dual-tube technique: evaluation in a cadaver model.
    Musacchio M, Patel N, Bagan B, Deutsch H, Vaccaro AR, Ratliff J.
    Surg Neurol; 2007 Apr 15; 67(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 17350398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. An endoscopic curved Kerrison rongeur for spinal stenosis surgery.
    Frank EH, Martin J, Hsu FP.
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2002 Dec 15; 45(4):254-6. PubMed ID: 12494364
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Anatomical background of low back pain: variability and degeneration of the lumbar spinal canal and intervertebral disc].
    van Roy P, Barbaix E, Clarijs JP, Mense S.
    Schmerz; 2001 Dec 15; 15(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 11793145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Implications of lumbar plexus anatomy for removal of total disc replacements through a posterior approach.
    Bumpass DB, Keller TC, Robinson EP, Marks I, Iwanik M, Arlet V, Shen FH.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr 20; 33(9):E274-8. PubMed ID: 18427306
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Percent spinal canal compromise on MRI utilized for predicting the need for surgical treatment in single-level lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.
    Carlisle E, Luna M, Tsou PM, Wang JC.
    Spine J; 2005 Apr 20; 5(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 16291099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [If it becomes too narrow for the spinal cord--plea for a joint venture].
    Rompe JD, Pfeil J.
    Orthopade; 2003 Oct 20; 32(10):847. PubMed ID: 14579014
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Transiliac approach for exposure of lumbosacral intervertebral disk and foramen: technique description.
    Carozzo C, Cachon T, Genevois JP, Fau D, Remy D, Daniaux L, Collard F, Viguier E.
    Vet Surg; 2008 Jan 20; 37(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 18199054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.