These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 9556325

  • 1. Reliability of photographic analysis in determining change in scar appearance.
    Crowe JM, Simpson K, Johnson W, Allen J.
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1998; 19(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 9556325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Reliability and Photographic Equivalency of the Scar Cosmesis Assessment and Rating (SCAR) Scale, an Outcome Measure for Postoperative Scars.
    Kantor J.
    JAMA Dermatol; 2017 Jan 01; 153(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 27806156
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability.
    Baryza MJ, Baryza GA.
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 1995 Jan 01; 16(5):535-8. PubMed ID: 8537427
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A modified Vancouver Scar Scale linked with TBSA (mVSS-TBSA): Inter-rater reliability of an innovative burn scar assessment method.
    Gankande TU, Wood FM, Edgar DW, Duke JM, DeJong HM, Henderson AE, Wallace HJ.
    Burns; 2013 Sep 01; 39(6):1142-9. PubMed ID: 23433706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Health professionals' and consumers' opinion: what is considered important when rating burn scars from photographs?
    Simons M, Tyack Z.
    J Burn Care Res; 2011 Sep 01; 32(2):275-85. PubMed ID: 21233729
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Rating the resolving hypertrophic scar: comparison of the Vancouver Scar Scale and scar volume.
    Nedelec B, Shankowsky HA, Tredget EE.
    J Burn Care Rehabil; 2000 Sep 01; 21(3):205-12. PubMed ID: 10850901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Visual assessment of linear scars: a new tool.
    Kerrigan CL, Homa K.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Nov 01; 124(5):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 20009837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A systematic review of the quality of burn scar rating scales for clinical and research use.
    Tyack Z, Simons M, Spinks A, Wasiak J.
    Burns; 2012 Feb 01; 38(1):6-18. PubMed ID: 22047828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Reliable scar scoring system to assess photographs of burn patients.
    Mecott GA, Finnerty CC, Herndon DN, Al-Mousawi AM, Branski LK, Hegde S, Kraft R, Williams FN, Maldonado SA, Rivero HG, Rodriguez-Escobar N, Jeschke MG.
    J Surg Res; 2015 Dec 01; 199(2):688-97. PubMed ID: 26092214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®).
    Gankande TU, Duke JM, Danielsen PL, DeJong HM, Wood FM, Wallace HJ.
    Burns; 2014 Dec 01; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.