These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
313 related items for PubMed ID: 9563069
1. Coverage and precision of confidence intervals for area under the curve using parametric and non-parametric methods in a toxicokinetic experimental design. Bonate PL. Pharm Res; 1998 Mar; 15(3):405-10. PubMed ID: 9563069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Applying Bailer's method for AUC confidence intervals to sparse sampling. Nedelman JR, Gibiansky E, Lau DT. Pharm Res; 1995 Jan; 12(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 7724473 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mode CJ, Tenekedjiev KI, Nikolova ND, Kolev K. ; 2011 02 28. PubMed ID: 28045483 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of Bailer's method for AUC confidence intervals from sparse non-normally distributed drug concentrations in toxicokinetic studies. Pai SM, Nedelman JR, Hajian G, Gibiansky E, Batra VK. Pharm Res; 1996 Sep 28; 13(9):1280-2. PubMed ID: 8893262 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-parametric bootstrap confidence intervals for the intraclass correlation coefficient. Ukoumunne OC, Davison AC, Gulliford MC, Chinn S. Stat Med; 2003 Dec 30; 22(24):3805-21. PubMed ID: 14673940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of confidence/credible interval methods for the area under the ROC curve for continuous diagnostic tests with small sample size. Feng D, Cortese G, Baumgartner R. Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Dec 30; 26(6):2603-2621. PubMed ID: 26323286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Nonparametric confidence intervals for Tmax in sequence-stratified crossover studies. Willavize SA, Morgenthien EA. Pharm Stat; 2008 Dec 30; 7(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 17256803 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Resampling methods in sparse sampling situations in preclinical pharmacokinetic studies. Mager H, Göller G. J Pharm Sci; 1998 Mar 30; 87(3):372-8. PubMed ID: 9523992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Overlap coefficient for assessing the similarity of pharmacokinetic data between ethnically different populations. Mizuno S, Yamaguchi T, Fukushima A, Matsuyama Y, Ohashi Y. Clin Trials; 2005 Mar 30; 2(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 16279139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Histogram analysis of pharmacokinetic parameters by bootstrap resampling from one-point sampling data in animal experiments. Takemoto S, Yamaoka K, Nishikawa M, Takakura Y. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet; 2006 Dec 30; 21(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 17220561 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating upper confidence limits for extra risk in quantal multistage models. Bailer AJ, Smith RJ. Risk Anal; 1994 Dec 30; 14(6):1001-10. PubMed ID: 7846307 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Confidence intervals for the receiver operating characteristic area in studies with small samples. Obuchowski NA, Lieber ML. Acad Radiol; 1998 Aug 30; 5(8):561-71. PubMed ID: 9702267 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Confidence Intervals for the Probability of Superiority Effect Size Measure and the Area Under a Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve. Ruscio J, Mullen T. Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Mar 30; 47(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 26734848 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Serial versus sparse sampling in toxicokinetic studies. Tse FL, Nedelman JR. Pharm Res; 1996 Jul 30; 13(7):1105-8. PubMed ID: 8842053 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Biological variation: Evaluation of methods for constructing confidence intervals for estimates of within-person biological variation for different distributions of the within-person effect. Røraas T, Støve B, Petersen PH, Sandberg S. Clin Chim Acta; 2017 May 30; 468():166-173. PubMed ID: 28257883 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Two bootstrapping routines for obtaining imprecision estimates for nonparametric parameter distributions in nonlinear mixed effects models. Baverel PG, Savic RM, Karlsson MO. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2011 Feb 30; 38(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 21076858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving coverage probabilities for parametric tolerance intervals via bootstrap calibration. Zou Y, Young DS. Stat Med; 2020 Jul 20; 39(16):2152-2166. PubMed ID: 32249974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of parametric and bootstrap method in bioequivalence test. Ahn BJ, Yim DS. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol; 2009 Oct 20; 13(5):367-71. PubMed ID: 19915699 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Computing confidence intervals for standardized regression coefficients. Jones JA, Waller NG. Psychol Methods; 2013 Dec 20; 18(4):435-53. PubMed ID: 24079926 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]