These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

105 related items for PubMed ID: 9573792

  • 1. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer).
    Tyas MJ.
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 9573792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Three-year clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract).
    Tyas MJ.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 11203809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study.
    Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavvadia K.
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(4):231-4. PubMed ID: 10436476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
    Ermiş RB.
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in class III cavities: three-year results.
    Demirci M, Ersev H, Uçok M.
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 12022451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M, Loher C, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hinkel R.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Clinical evaluation of polyacid-modified resin composite posterior restorations: one-year results.
    Luo Y, Lo EC, Fang DT, Wei SH.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Oct; 31(9):630-6. PubMed ID: 11203987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A, van Dijken JW, Lindberg M.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
    Pollington S, van Noort R.
    Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cervical compomer restorations: the role of cavity etching in a 48-month clinical evaluation.
    Di Lenarda R, Cadenaro M, De Stefano Dorigo E.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Feb; 25(5):382-7. PubMed ID: 11203846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a composite and a compomer/composite (sandwich) in class II restorations.
    Wucher M, Grobler SR, Senekal PJ.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Aug; 15(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 12572648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and a compomer in restoring non-carious cervical lesions. 5-year results.
    Folwaczny M, Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R.
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):153-6. PubMed ID: 11572293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Bond strength of a resin composite to a polyacid-modified resin composite under different conditions.
    Benderli YG, Koray F, Turan N.
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(10):770-5. PubMed ID: 12553621
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract) in Class III cavities: 5-year results.
    Demirci M, Ersev H, Sancakli HS, Topçubaşi M.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 17073207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
    Loguercio AD, Reis A, Barbosa AN, Roulet JF.
    J Adhes Dent; 2003 Oct; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Noncarious class V lesions restored with a polyacid modified resin composite and a nanocomposite: a two-year clinical trial.
    Türkün LS, Celik EU.
    J Adhes Dent; 2008 Oct; 10(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 19058687
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability.
    Hannig M, Friedrichs C.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Oct; 26(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 11203774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 1-year results.
    Peters TC, Roeters JJ, Frankenmolen FW.
    Am J Dent; 1996 Apr; 9(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 9522693
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A prospective randomised clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: three-year results.
    Bottenberg P, Alaerts M, Keulemans F.
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 16963171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical performance of posterior compomer restorations over 4 years.
    Krämer N, García-Godoy F, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R.
    Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 16555660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.