These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
310 related items for PubMed ID: 9575997
1. A prospective comparison of the costs of reusable and limited-reuse laparoscopic instruments. DesCôteaux JG, Blackmore K, Parsons L. Can J Surg; 1998 Apr; 41(2):136-41. PubMed ID: 9575997 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study]. Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Gutt C, Morawe G, Encke A. Zentralbl Chir; 1995 Apr; 120(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7887039 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-use versus reusable laparoscopic surgical instruments: a comparative cost analysis. Schaer GN, Koechli OR, Haller U. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1812-5. PubMed ID: 8610767 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Single-patient-use laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective. Straface S. Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Dec; 3(2-3):135-9. PubMed ID: 7552130 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of economic and environmental impacts between disposable and reusable instruments used for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Adler S, Scherrer M, Rückauer KD, Daschner FD. Surg Endosc; 2005 Feb; 19(2):268-72. PubMed ID: 15580444 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instrument costs. Eddie G, White S. Aust N Z J Surg; 1996 Oct; 66(10):671-5. PubMed ID: 8855921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. ["Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic surgery--a controlled study"]. Engert K. Zentralbl Chir; 1995 Oct; 120(5):416. PubMed ID: 7610732 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Cost Influence the Choice of Disposable Versus Reusable Instruments? Mailed Survey of Obstetrician/Gynaecologists. Yang H, Capstick VA, Bentz C, Ross S. J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Oct; 41(10):1416-1422. PubMed ID: 30885506 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A close-up look at laparoscopic instrument costs. Mater Manag Health Care; 1993 Nov; 2(11):28-32. PubMed ID: 10171719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Durability and function of disposable versus reusable laparoscopic instrumentation. Bessell JR, Patkin M, Isabel L. Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Nov; 3(2-3):143-6. PubMed ID: 7552132 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Systematic review of reusable versus disposable laparoscopic instruments: costs and safety. Siu J, Hill AG, MacCormick AD. ANZ J Surg; 2017 Jan; 87(1-2):28-33. PubMed ID: 27878921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy lends itself well to another look at reusable vs. disposable instrument packs. Hickey M, Fields M. Hosp Mater Manage; 1996 May; 21(5):14-5. PubMed ID: 10157583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital]. Lejeune C, Prost P, Michiels C, Roullaud-Guenfoudi MP, Phelip JM, Martin L, Rassiat E, Faivre J. Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2001 May; 25(6-7):669-73. PubMed ID: 11673734 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reusable instruments are more cost-effective than disposable instruments for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Apelgren KN, Blank ML, Slomski CA, Hadjis NS. Surg Endosc; 1994 Jan; 8(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 8153862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Disposable versus reusable instruments in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective, randomised study. Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Gutt CN, Encke A. Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Jan; 3(2-3):147-50. PubMed ID: 7552133 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Study deems single-use instruments more cost-effective than reusable in lap choly procedures. Hosp Mater Manage; 1995 Jul; 20(7):18-9. PubMed ID: 10172368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic impact of laparoscopic instrumentation: a company perspective. Swem T, Fazzalari R. Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Jul; 3(2-3):129-32. PubMed ID: 7552128 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]