These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

535 related items for PubMed ID: 9577819

  • 1. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
    Müller-Deile J, Rudert H, Brademann G, Frese K.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Audiological results with the cochlear implant.
    Thielemeir MA, Brimacombe JA, Eisenberg LS.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982 Mar; 91(2 Pt 3):27-34. PubMed ID: 6805394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation.
    Adunka OF, Buss E, Clark MS, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN, Beers M, Boermans PP, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Nov; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.
    Gifford RH, Shallop JK, Peterson AM.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Nov; 13(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 18212519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
    Fraysse B, Dillier N, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Morera Perez C, Morgon AH, Müller-Deile J, Ramos Macias A.
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J.
    HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Clarion Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant--surgical technique, complications, and results: a single institutional experience.
    Lalwani AK, Larky JB, Wareing MJ, Kwast K, Schindler RA.
    Am J Otol; 1998 Jan; 19(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 9455952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study.
    Lorens A, Polak M, Piotrowska A, Skarzynski H.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb; 118(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 18000465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.