These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

535 related items for PubMed ID: 9577819

  • 1. [Cochlear implant for non-deaf patients?].
    Müller-Deile J, Rudert H, Brademann G, Frese K.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 Mar; 77(3):136-43. PubMed ID: 9577819
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults. A speech perception study.
    Santarelli R, De Filippi R, Genovese E, Arslan E.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Mar; 13(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 18259078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Audiological results with the cochlear implant.
    Thielemeir MA, Brimacombe JA, Eisenberg LS.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 1982 Mar; 91(2 Pt 3):27-34. PubMed ID: 6805394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing].
    Ruh S, Battmer RD, Strauss-Schier A, Lenarz T.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jun; 76(6):347-50. PubMed ID: 9333278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
    Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM.
    Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
    Hamzavi J, Adunka O, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W.
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun 02; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Aspects of auditory speech perception in cochlear implant and hearing aid managed children].
    Junge FM, Dahm MC, Braun O.
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997 Jun 02; 147(10):255-8. PubMed ID: 9324868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation.
    Adunka OF, Buss E, Clark MS, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov 02; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN, Beers M, Boermans PP, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Nov 02; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.
    Gifford RH, Shallop JK, Peterson AM.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Nov 02; 13(3):193-205. PubMed ID: 18212519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Hearing rehabilitation in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients: cochlear versus auditory brainstem implantation.
    Vincenti V, Pasanisi E, Guida M, Di Trapani G, Sanna M.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2008 Nov 02; 13(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 18259080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cochlear implants for adults obtaining marginal benefit from acoustic amplification: a European study.
    Fraysse B, Dillier N, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Morera Perez C, Morgon AH, Müller-Deile J, Ramos Macias A.
    Am J Otol; 1998 Sep 02; 19(5):591-7. PubMed ID: 9752966
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Experiences in Kiel with the cochlear implant].
    Müller-Deile J, Schmidt BJ, Rudert H.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1994 Jun 02; 73(6):300-10. PubMed ID: 8060448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J.
    HNO; 1995 Sep 02; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM, Séguin C, Schramm DR, Armstrong S, Chénier J.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct 02; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Clarion Multi-Strategy Cochlear Implant--surgical technique, complications, and results: a single institutional experience.
    Lalwani AK, Larky JB, Wareing MJ, Kwast K, Schindler RA.
    Am J Otol; 1998 Jan 02; 19(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 9455952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun 02; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Results with cochlear implantation in adults with speech recognition scores exceeding current criteria.
    Amoodi HA, Mick PT, Shipp DB, Friesen LM, Nedzelski JM, Chen JM, Lin VY.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan 02; 33(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 22090001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study.
    Lorens A, Polak M, Piotrowska A, Skarzynski H.
    Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb 02; 118(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 18000465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct 02; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.