These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

286 related items for PubMed ID: 9579626

  • 1. Treatment of gingival recession with titanium reinforced barrier membranes versus connective tissue grafts.
    Jepsen K, Heinz B, Halben JH, Jepsen S.
    J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):383-91. PubMed ID: 9579626
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession.
    Borghetti A, Glise JM, Monnet-Corti V, Dejou J.
    J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10102549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
    Paolantonio M.
    J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
    Wang HL, Bunyaratavej P, Labadie M, Shyr Y, MacNeil RL.
    J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects.
    Zucchelli G, Clauser C, De Sanctis M, Calandriello M.
    J Periodontol; 1998 Feb; 69(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 9526912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Root coverage: comparison of coronally positioned flap with and without titanium-reinforced barrier membrane.
    Lins LH, de Lima AF, Sallum AW.
    J Periodontol; 2003 Feb; 74(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 12666704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage.
    Ito K, Oshio K, Shiomi N, Murai S.
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 11203942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal gingival recession.
    Pini Prato G, Tinti C, Vincenzi G, Magnani C, Cortellini P, Clauser C.
    J Periodontol; 1992 Nov; 63(11):919-28. PubMed ID: 1453307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of 2 root coverage techniques: guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable matrix style membrane versus a connective tissue graft combined with a coronally positioned pedicle graft without vertical incisions. results of a series of consecutive cases.
    Harris RJ.
    J Periodontol; 1998 Dec; 69(12):1426-34. PubMed ID: 9926774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane.
    Müller HP, Stahl M, Eger T.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Apr; 21(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 11829391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
    Gunay H, Dogan S, Geurtsen W.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Treatment of gingival recession using a collagen membrane with or without the use of demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft for space maintenance.
    Kimble KM, Eber RM, Soehren S, Shyr Y, Wang HL.
    J Periodontol; 2004 Feb; 75(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 15068108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Histologic evaluation of new attachment utilizing a titanium-reinforced barrier membrane in a mucogingival recession defect. A case report.
    Parma-Benfenati S, Tinti C.
    J Periodontol; 1998 Jul; 69(7):834-9. PubMed ID: 9706863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects.
    McGuire MK, Scheyer ET.
    J Periodontol; 2010 Aug; 81(8):1108-17. PubMed ID: 20350159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Histologic assessment of new attachment following the treatment of a human buccal recession by means of a guided tissue regeneration procedure.
    Cortellini P, Clauser C, Prato GP.
    J Periodontol; 1993 May; 64(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 8515369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Subgingival acellular dermal matrix allograft for the treatment of gingival recession: a case report.
    Tal H.
    J Periodontol; 1999 Sep; 70(9):1118-24. PubMed ID: 10505815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.