These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

218 related items for PubMed ID: 9584655

  • 61. [Management of radiographic technics].
    Fan Y.
    Zhonghua Fang She Xue Za Zhi; 1984 Nov; 18(4):307-9. PubMed ID: 6242306
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 62. The changing face of malpractice law: a perspective for radiation technologists.
    Irvine J.
    Can J Radiogr Radiother Nucl Med; 1984 Aug; 15(3):93-9. PubMed ID: 10267680
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 63. Direct radiography can boost radiology productivity, cut costs.
    Health Care Cost Reengineering Rep; 1998 Mar; 3(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 10178786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 64. [The amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector. Clinical experiences].
    Schmidt EL, Herbig W.
    Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 12764586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 65. Survey results: AHRA (American Healthcare Radiology Administrators) member staffing survey. Part I--Hospital technical vacancies for diagnostic radiology, CT, MRI, ultrasound, nuclear medicine and radiation therapy.
    Kirschner LB.
    Radiol Manage; 1988 May; 10(3):35-51. PubMed ID: 10302633
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 66. The healthcare environment and its impact on radiologic education: a working model.
    Meyers A, Goldsworthy R.
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Aug; 9(8):67-8. PubMed ID: 10106051
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 67. Notable X-ray installations.
    Health Estate J; 1993 Sep; 47(7):7-8, 10. PubMed ID: 10128880
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 68. Performance evaluation of radiologic technologists: a method for improving the communicative process.
    Kettlehake JE, Malott JC.
    Radiol Manage; 1987 Sep; 9(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 10288781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 69. Performance standards: how to assess and address human resource needs.
    Vann B, Clinton M.
    Radiol Manage; 1988 Sep; 10(3):63-6. PubMed ID: 10288306
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 70.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 71.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 72. MRI reimbursement approved, technologist standards published.
    Ordway JM.
    Radiol Manage; 1986 Jan; 8(1):14. PubMed ID: 10300671
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 73.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 74. X-ray technique charts.
    Eastman TR.
    Radiol Technol; 2004 Jan; 76(2):98. PubMed ID: 15587612
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 75.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 76. The superhighway to buying criteria.
    Adm Radiol; 1994 Dec; 13(12):23-4, 27-33. PubMed ID: 10161177
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 77. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania.
    Sniureviciute M, Adliene D.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Dec; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 78. [Problems of technologic re-equipment of X-ray diagnostic services in the Russian Federation].
    Blinov NN.
    Med Tekh; 1998 Dec; (6):41-4. PubMed ID: 9949991
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 79.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 80.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.