These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Pancherz H. Swed Dent J Suppl; 1982 Jul; 15():189-96. PubMed ID: 6963773 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cephalometric evaluation of tongue position and airway remodelling in children treated with swallowing occlusal contact intercept appliance (S.O.C.I.A.). Ciavarella D, Lo Russo L, Mastrovincenzo M, Padalino S, Montaruli G, Giannatempo G, Cassano M, Laino L, Lo Muzio L. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Nov; 78(11):1857-60. PubMed ID: 25193586 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of cervical spine posture after functional therapy with twin-block appliances: A retrospective cohort study. Kamal AT, Fida M. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 May; 155(5):656-661. PubMed ID: 31053281 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Features and treatment of skeletal class III malocclusion with severe lateral mandibular shift and asymmetric vertical dimension. Kondo E. World J Orthod; 2004 May; 5(1):9-24. PubMed ID: 15615138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation. Windmiller EC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cervical curvature. A cephalometric study in position of clinical rest]. Sandoval P, Henríquez J, Fuentes R, Cabezas G, Roldán R. Rev Med Chil; 1999 May; 127(5):547-55. PubMed ID: 10451624 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective study of the treatment effects of a removable appliance with palatal crib combined with high-pull chincup therapy in anterior open-bite patients. Pedrin F, Almeida MR, Almeida RR, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Torres F. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Mar; 129(3):418-23. PubMed ID: 16527639 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment of Class II high angle malocclusions with the Herbst appliance: a cephalometric investigation. Schiavoni R, Grenga V, Macri V. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Nov; 102(5):393-409. PubMed ID: 1476105 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of cervical posture of children in skeletal class I, II, and III. D'Attilio M, Caputi S, Epifania E, Festa F, Tecco S. Cranio; 2005 Jul; 23(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 16128357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical and craniocervical posture as predictors of craniofacial growth. Solow B, Siersbaek-Nielsen S. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 May; 101(5):449-58. PubMed ID: 1590294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in soft tissue profile during the treatment of Class III malocclusion. Kerr WJ, Ten Have TR. Br J Orthod; 1987 Nov; 14(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 3481274 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study between children with and without cleft lip and cleft palate, part 1: cephalometric analysis. Zúñiga C, Miralles R, Carvajal R, Ravera MJ, Contreras P, Cavada G. Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 May; 37(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 10830808 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures. Bilgiç F, Hamamci O, Başaran G. Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 22372266 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]